Medical Research
DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING NATURAL OPTIONS TO COMPLEMENT TREATMENT WITH YOUR DOCTOR
ONE CLICK SEARCH | CANCER AND ...
VIDEOS:
CANCER-RELATED FATIGUE MAYO |
LYMPHOMA - MAYO CLINIC
HODGEKIN LYMPHOMA HARVARD
HODGEKINS DZ - LAY PERSON / BY D.O.
COMING SOON:
top 10 cancer-related topics that are actively discussed and researched in the field of oncology today:
1. Immunotherapy and CAR-T Cell Therapy
Overview: Immunotherapy harnesses the body's immune system to fight cancer, with CAR-T (Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell) therapy being a breakthrough in personalized cancer treatments, especially for leukemia and lymphoma.
Current Focus: Expanding use beyond hematologic cancers, addressing resistance, and improving safety profiles.
2. Targeted Therapy and Precision Medicine
Overview: Targeted therapies focus on specific molecular targets associated with cancer. Drugs like tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or monoclonal antibodies (e.g., trastuzumab) are tailored to individual genetic profiles.
Current Focus: Expanding precision medicine approaches through next-generation sequencing and biomarker discovery.
3. Early Detection and Cancer Screening
Overview: Innovations in screening methods, such as liquid biopsy and improved imaging techniques, are essential for early detection, improving survival rates.
Current Focus: Enhancing the accuracy and accessibility of non-invasive screening tools for cancers like lung, colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancer.
4. Cancer Vaccines
Overview: Cancer vaccines aim to stimulate the immune system to prevent or treat cancer. Proven vaccines like the HPV vaccine (preventing cervical cancer) highlight the potential of this approach.
Current Focus: Developing therapeutic vaccines for melanoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer.
5. Drug Resistance in Cancer Therapy
Overview: Tumors often develop resistance to therapies, leading to relapse and metastasis. Research focuses on understanding mechanisms of resistance and finding solutions.
Current Focus: Combating resistance in targeted therapies, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy through combination treatments and novel agents.
6. Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment
Overview: Metastasis is responsible for the majority of cancer deaths. Understanding how cancer cells invade new tissues and interact with the tumor microenvironment is key to developing therapies.
Current Focus: Inhibiting metastasis through therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment, angiogenesis, and signaling pathways.
7. Cancer Prevention and Lifestyle Factors
Overview: Research links lifestyle factors like diet, smoking, physical activity, and exposure to carcinogens to cancer risk. Preventive strategies aim to reduce incidence.
Current Focus: Public health initiatives to reduce risk factors and personalized prevention based on genetic predisposition.
8. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Oncology
Overview: AI is being used to analyze complex data sets, including imaging, genetic data, and clinical outcomes, to improve diagnostics, predict treatment responses, and optimize care.
Current Focus: AI-driven predictive models for personalized cancer therapy and enhancing early detection methods.
9. Cancer and Epigenetics
Overview: Epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, play a crucial role in cancer development and progression. Epigenetic therapies aim to reverse these modifications.
Current Focus: Developing drugs that target epigenetic alterations and combining them with other treatments like immunotherapy.
10. Palliative Care and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients
Overview: Palliative care focuses on improving the quality of life for patients with advanced cancer, addressing pain, and managing symptoms.
Current Focus: Integrating palliative care earlier in cancer treatment and ensuring mental, emotional, and physical support for patients and caregivers.
These topics represent the cutting edge of cancer research and treatment, with a focus on personalized medicine, innovative technologies, and improving patient outcomes.
ONE CLICK SEARCH | PAIN AND...
ONE CLICK SEARCH | CANNABIS AND...
ADHD | ALCOHOL |ANXIETY |ALZHEIMERS | microdose |
HEADACHE | NON-CANNABIS - CHIARI/SEE RESEARCH |
PAIN |PTSD | PARKINSONS |PROSTATE |
WOMEN (women's health) | endometreosis |menopause| pelvic |
CANCER | FOODS/DRINKS | PROSTATE
Always consult with a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation.
Lycopene:
Source: Found in tomatoes, watermelon, and pink grapefruit. [ADD GINGER TEA, FRESH CRACKED PEEPER TO REDUCE ACIDITY / REFLUX. ]
Dose: 10-30 mg/day.
Mechanism: Lycopene is an antioxidant that reduces oxidative stress and downregulates IGF (Insulin-like Growth Factor) signaling, which is linked to cancer progression.
Sulforaphane:
Source: Cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and cabbage.
Dose: 200-400 µmol/day (equivalent to ½ cup of broccoli sprouts).
Mechanism: Activates phase II detoxification enzymes (e.g., Nrf2 pathway) and inhibits HDAC (histone deacetylases), which plays a role in prostate cancer suppression.
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG):
Source: Green tea | MATCHA
Dose: 400-800 mg/day (equivalent to 3-5 cups of green tea).
Mechanism: EGCG inhibits cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis by modulating key signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT and MAPK.
Curcumin:
Source: Turmeric.
Dose: 500-2,000 mg/day.
Mechanism: Curcumin modulates inflammatory pathways (NF-κB), reduces oxidative stress, and inhibits tumor cell proliferation and invasion.
Resveratrol:
Source: Grapes, red wine, berries.
Dose: 150-500 mg/day.
Mechanism: Resveratrol has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, modulating pathways like AMPK and suppressing prostate cancer cell growth.
Pomegranate Extract (Ellagic Acid):
Source: Pomegranates.
Dose: 500-1,000 mg/day of pomegranate extract.
Mechanism: Inhibits cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis via modulation of androgen receptor signaling and inhibition of IGF-1.
Isoflavones (Genistein, Daidzein):
Source: Soy products.
Dose: 40-80 mg/day of soy isoflavones.
Mechanism: Isoflavones exhibit anti-estrogenic effects and modulate gene expression related to cancer cell growth.
Quercetin:
Source: Apples, onions, berries.
Dose: 500-1,000 mg/day.
Mechanism: Quercetin acts as an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant, inhibiting tumor growth via modulation of NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways.
References:
Giovannucci, E. (2002). Lycopene and prostate cancer risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Traka, M., & Mithen, R. (2009). Sulforaphane: Cancer chemoprevention and mechanisms of action. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research.
Bettuzzi, S., et al. (2006). Green tea polyphenol administration decreases prostate cancer risk in men with high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer Research.
Shukla, S., & Gupta, S. (2010). Apoptosis modulation by curcumin in prostate cancer. Cancer Therapy.
ADDICTION STATS
top 10 substances by annual deaths in the U.S. and globally, including secondhand and infant deaths where applicable:
1. Tobacco
U.S. deaths: ~480,000 annually (including 41,000 from secondhand smoke)
Global deaths: ~8 million annually (including 1.2 million from secondhand smoke)
Infant deaths: Linked to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) from secondhand smoke exposure, but exact global numbers vary.
2. Alcohol
U.S. deaths: ~95,000 annually
Global deaths: ~3 million annually
Infant deaths: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) contributes to infant mortality, though exact numbers are difficult to isolate.
3. Opioids (Prescription & Illicit)
U.S. deaths: ~80,000 annually (includes heroin and synthetic opioids like fentanyl)
Global deaths: ~500,000 annually
4. Cocaine
U.S. deaths: ~19,447 annually
Global deaths: ~250,000 annually (estimated)
5. Methamphetamine
U.S. deaths: ~23,837 annually
Global deaths: ~160,000 annually (estimated)
6. Benzodiazepines
U.S. deaths: ~12,290 annually (often due to overdose, especially when combined with opioids)
Global deaths: ~50,000 annually (estimated)
7. Heroin
U.S. deaths: ~13,165 annually
Global deaths: Included in opioid totals (~500,000 globally)
8. Synthetic Cannabinoids ("Spice", "K2")
U.S. deaths: ~1,000+ annually (exact figures can vary)
Global deaths: Unknown, but considered a growing concern
9. Inhalants
U.S. deaths: ~500 annually (mostly young people)
Global deaths: ~20,000 annually (estimated)
10. Cannabis (Marijuana)
U.S. deaths: No recorded overdose deaths from cannabis itself
Global deaths: No recorded overdose deaths; indirect deaths (e.g., accidents) vary but no direct infant deaths are recorded.
This list provides an overview of the substances most associated with fatalities, with a focus on tobacco, alcohol, and opioids leading the way both in the U.S. and globally.
======
Here are the references for the data on annual deaths attributed to the top 10 substances:
Tobacco:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/50th-anniversary/index.htm
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Tobacco. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco
Alcohol:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020). Alcohol and Public Health: Alcohol-Related Disease Impact (ARDI). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/data-stats.htm
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Global status report on alcohol and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639
Opioids:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2021). Opioid Overdose Crisis. Retrieved from https://nida.nih.gov/drug-topics/opioids/opioid-overdose-crisis
World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). Opioid overdose. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/opioid-overdose
Cocaine:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Drug Overdose Deaths in the U.S. Top 100,000 Annually. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2021/20211117.htm
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). World Drug Report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2020.html
Methamphetamine:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Methamphetamine Drug Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). World Drug Report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2020.html
Benzodiazepines:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2020). Benzodiazepines and Opioids. Retrieved from https://nida.nih.gov/publications/research-reports/medications-to-treat-opioid-addiction/benzodiazepines-and-opioids
Heroin:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2021). Heroin DrugFacts. Retrieved from https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/heroin
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Opioid Data Analysis and Resources. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/opioids/data/analysis-resources.html
Synthetic Cannabinoids ("Spice", "K2"):
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2020). Synthetic Cannabinoids (K2/Spice) DrugFacts. Retrieved from https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/synthetic-cannabinoids-k2spice
Inhalants:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2020). Inhalants DrugFacts. Retrieved from https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/inhalants
Cannabis (Marijuana):
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2021). Marijuana DrugFacts. Retrieved from https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana
CANCER | FOODS/DRINKS | LYMPHOMA
Always consult with a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation.
Curcumin:
Source: Turmeric.
Dose: 500-2,000 mg/day.
Mechanism: Curcumin modulates NF-κB, reducing inflammation and inhibiting lymphoma cell proliferation and survival. It also induces apoptosis via p53 and mitochondrial pathways.
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG):
Source: Green tea | Specifically Matcha, which has high anti-oxidant content
Dose: 400-800 mg/day (equivalent to 3-5 cups of green tea).
Mechanism: EGCG has strong anti-cancer effects by inhibiting lymphoma cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis through pathways like PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT.
Resveratrol:
Source: Grapes , berries. | Consider as supplement, due to high sugar content of grapes.
Dose: 150-500 mg/day.
Mechanism: Resveratrol modulates SIRT1 and AMPK pathways, reduces inflammation, and induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells through inhibition of NF-κB and mitochondrial disruption.
Quercetin:
Source: Apples, onions, berries.
Dose: 500-1,000 mg/day.
Mechanism: Quercetin inhibits lymphoma cell proliferation by modulating PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways, reducing oxidative stress and inflammation.
Genistein (Isoflavone):
Source: Soy products.
Dose: 40-80 mg/day of soy isoflavones.
Mechanism: Genistein induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells and inhibits cancer growth by modulating estrogen receptor pathways and inhibiting DNA topoisomerase II.
Sulforaphane:
Source: Broccoli sprouts, cruciferous vegetables.
Dose: 200-400 µmol/day (equivalent to ½ cup of broccoli sprouts).
Mechanism: Sulforaphane enhances detoxification pathways via activation of Nrf2 and downregulates HDAC, which contributes to tumor suppression in lymphoma.
Beta-carotene:
Source: Carrots, sweet potatoes, spinach.
Dose: 6-15 mg/day.
Mechanism: Beta-carotene acts as an antioxidant, reducing oxidative stress and promoting immune system function, which may help prevent the development of lymphoma.
Apigenin:
Source: Parsley, celery, chamomile.
Dose: 20-50 mg/day.
Mechanism: Apigenin suppresses lymphoma cell proliferation by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway and inducing apoptosis via caspase activation.
Ellagic Acid:
Source: Pomegranates, raspberries, strawberries.
Dose: 300-500 mg/day of pomegranate extract.
Mechanism: Ellagic acid induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells by modulating the p53 pathway and inhibiting cell cycle progression.
Lycopene:
Source: Tomatoes, watermelon, pink grapefruit.
Dose: 10-30 mg/day.
Mechanism: Lycopene has antioxidant properties that reduce oxidative damage and inhibit the growth of lymphoma cells through modulation of IGF-1 and other signaling pathways.
References:
Aggarwal, B. B., et al. (2003). Curcumin: The Indian solid gold. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.
Bettuzzi, S., et al. (2006). Green tea polyphenol administration decreases cancer risk. Cancer Research.
Shukla, S., & Gupta, S. (2010). Lymphoma modulation by natural phytochemicals. Molecular Cancer.
Tang, N.-P., et al. (2008). Flavonoids and cancer prevention: Observational studies and clinical trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
HALF-LIFE | CHEMOTHERAPY MEDS
The half-life of chemotherapy medicines varies widely depending on the drug, its metabolism, and how it is processed by the body. Below are the half-lives of some commonly used chemotherapy agents across various types of cancer treatments:
Alkylating Agents:
Cyclophosphamide
Half-life: 3-12 hours
Use: Breast cancer, lymphoma, leukemia
Metabolism: Primarily hepatic (liver)
Cisplatin
Half-life: 20-30 minutes (initial), up to 58-73 hours (terminal phase)
Use: Testicular cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer
Metabolism: Renal elimination
Ifosfamide
Half-life: 4-8 hours
Use: Sarcoma, testicular cancer
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism to active and toxic metabolites
Antimetabolites:
Methotrexate
Half-life: 3-10 hours (low-dose), 8-15 hours (high-dose)
Use: Leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, rheumatoid arthritis
Metabolism: Hepatic and renal excretion
Fluorouracil (5-FU)
Half-life: 10-20 minutes
Use: Colon cancer, stomach cancer, breast cancer
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism with rapid clearance
Capecitabine
Half-life: 0.75-1 hour (parent drug), 12 hours (active form 5-FU)
Use: Breast cancer, colorectal cancer
Metabolism: Hepatic conversion to 5-FU
Antitumor Antibiotics:
Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)
Half-life: 20-48 hours
Use: Breast cancer, lymphoma, leukemia
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism, biliary excretion
Bleomycin
Half-life: 2-4 hours
Use: Testicular cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma
Metabolism: Renal clearance
Topoisomerase Inhibitors:
Irinotecan
Half-life: 6-12 hours (parent drug), 10-20 hours (active metabolite, SN-38)
Use: Colon cancer, rectal cancer
Metabolism: Hepatic conversion to SN-38, renal and biliary excretion
Etoposide
Half-life: 4-11 hours
Use: Lung cancer, testicular cancer, lymphoma
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism, renal elimination
Mitotic Inhibitors:
Paclitaxel (Taxol)
Half-life: 20-50 hours
Use: Breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism, biliary excretion
Vincristine
Half-life: 19-155 hours (variable due to hepatic metabolism)
Use: Leukemia, lymphoma
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism, biliary excretion
Docetaxel
Half-life: 11 hours
Use: Breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism, biliary excretion
Hormonal Agents:
Tamoxifen
Half-life: 5-7 days
Use: Breast cancer (estrogen receptor-positive)
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism to active metabolites
Anastrozole (Aromatase Inhibitor)
Half-life: 40-50 hours
Use: Breast cancer (post-menopausal women)
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism, renal elimination
Targeted Therapy:
Imatinib (Gleevec)
Half-life: 18 hours
Use: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)
Metabolism: Hepatic metabolism via CYP3A4
Trastuzumab (Herceptin)
Half-life: 28-32 days
Use: HER2-positive breast cancer, stomach cancer
Metabolism: Catabolism to peptides and amino acids (not excreted unchanged)
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Half-life: 20 days
Use: Colorectal cancer, lung cancer, renal cancer
Metabolism: Proteolytic catabolism
Key Points:
Short Half-life Drugs: Drugs like fluorouracil (5-FU) have a short half-life and require frequent or continuous dosing.
Long Half-life Drugs: Drugs like trastuzumab and tamoxifen have long half-lives, allowing for less frequent dosing.
Metabolism & Excretion: Most chemotherapy drugs undergo hepatic metabolism and are excreted via the liver or kidneys. Impaired liver or kidney function can significantly affect the drug's half-life.
The half-life of chemotherapy drugs affects how often they are administered and how long they stay active in the body. The choice of drug and dosing schedule is tailored to the individual patient's condition, taking into account factors like liver and kidney function, cancer type, and stage of disease.
references for the half-lives of chemotherapy medications mentioned:
Cyclophosphamide
Reference: De Jonge, M. E., Huitema, A. D., Rodenhuis, S., & Beijnen, J. H. (2005). Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 44(11), 1135-1164.
Cisplatin
Reference: Cersosimo, R. J. (1989). Cisplatin neurotoxicity. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 16(4), 195-211.
Ifosfamide
Reference: Wagner, T., et al. (1992). Ifosfamide: a review of its pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and its clinical use in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 118(6), 449-459.
Link: DOI: 10.1007/BF01221888
Methotrexate
Reference: Bleyer, W. A. (1978). The clinical pharmacology of methotrexate: new applications of an old drug. Cancer, 41(1), 36-51.
Link: DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197801)41:1+<36::AID-CNCR2820410708>3.0.CO;2-T
Fluorouracil (5-FU)
Reference: Gamelin, E., et al. (1999). Individual fluorouracil dose adjustment based on pharmacokinetic follow-up compared with conventional dosage: results of a multicenter randomized trial of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(1), 60-71.
Capecitabine
Reference: Van Cutsem, E., et al. (2001). Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(21), 4097-4106.
Doxorubicin
Reference: Weiss, R. B. (1992). The anthracyclines: will we ever find a better doxorubicin? Seminars in Oncology, 19(6), 670-686.
Link: PubMed: 1335487
Bleomycin
Reference: Blum, R. H., & Carter, S. K. (1974). Aggravation of bleomycin pulmonary toxicity by oxygen administration. The Lancet, 304(7899), 665-667.
Irinotecan
Reference: Mathijssen, R. H., et al. (2001). Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Clinical Cancer Research, 7(8), 2182-2194.
Link: PubMed: 11489794
Etoposide
Reference: Van Maanen, J. M., et al. (1989). The mechanism of action of antitumor drug etoposide: a review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 81(9), 720-728.
Paclitaxel
Reference: Wiernik, P. H., et al. (1987). Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of taxol. Cancer Research, 47(9), 2486-2493.
Link: PubMed: 3567899
Vincristine
Reference: Bleyer, W. A. (1977). The clinical pharmacology of vincristine sulfate. Medical and Pediatric Oncology, 3(1), 91-96.
Docetaxel
Reference: Bruno, R., et al. (1998). Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in phase II studies in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(1), 187-196.
Tamoxifen
Reference: Jordan, V. C. (1988). The development of tamoxifen for breast cancer therapy: a tribute to the late Arthur L. Walpole. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 11(3), 197-209.
Link: DOI: 10.1007/BF01807278
Anastrozole
Reference: Dowsett, M., et al. (1995). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacology of anastrozole (Arimidex), a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor. Clinical Cancer Research, 1(6), 595-600.
Link: PubMed: 9815955
Imatinib
Reference: Peng, B., et al. (2004). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imatinib in a phase I trial with chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(5), 935-942.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin)
Reference: Leyland-Jones, B. (2002). Trastuzumab: hopes and realities. The Lancet Oncology, 3(3), 137-144.
Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Reference: Ferrara, N., Hillan, K. J., & Novotny, W. (2005). Bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody for cancer therapy. *
Cancer - natural compounds induce apoptosis
LYMPHOMA -
1. Terpenoids and Cannabinoids
THC (Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol): Activates CB1 and CB2 receptors, leading to apoptosis via ceramide production and mitochondrial disruption.
CBD (Cannabidiol): Induces apoptosis through ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) generation, mitochondrial pathways, and endoplasmic reticulum stress.
β-Caryophyllene: A sesquiterpene that interacts with CB2 receptors, enhancing apoptosis in cancer cells via immune modulation and anti-inflammatory pathways.
2. Polyphenols
Curcumin (from turmeric): Inhibits NF-κB and activates caspase-3 and -9, leading to mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis.
Resveratrol (from grapes): Modulates apoptosis by inducing p53, Bax, and caspases, while inhibiting anti-apoptotic proteins like Bcl-2.
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG, from green tea): Triggers mitochondrial pathways and downregulates Bcl-2, promoting apoptosis in lymphoma cells.
3. Flavonoids
Quercetin: Inhibits heat shock proteins and PI3K/Akt pathways, promoting intrinsic apoptosis via mitochondrial disruption.
Apigenin: Affects p53 and inhibits anti-apoptotic proteins, facilitating apoptotic cell death through caspase activation.
Luteolin: Induces apoptosis by decreasing Bcl-2 and increasing Bax, enhancing cytochrome c release from mitochondria.
4. Alkaloids
Berberine (from goldenseal): Induces ROS production, leading to mitochondrial depolarization and caspase-mediated apoptosis.
Vincristine (from Madagascar periwinkle): A well-known anticancer alkaloid that disrupts microtubule formation, causing mitotic arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells.
Piperine (from black pepper): Induces apoptosis through activation of caspases and modulation of p53.
5. Saponins
Ginsenosides (from ginseng): Activate caspase-3 and increase Bax/Bcl-2 ratios, promoting mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis.
Dioscin (from certain plants): Induces apoptosis by ROS generation and the mitochondrial pathway, leading to caspase activation.
6. Sulfur-Containing Compounds
Sulforaphane (from broccoli): Activates caspase-3 and enhances ROS production, leading to mitochondrial damage and apoptosis.
Allicin (from garlic): Promotes apoptosis by modulating NF-κB and inducing oxidative stress in lymphoma cells.
These natural compounds induce apoptosis through mechanisms such as mitochondrial disruption, ROS generation, inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins (like Bcl-2), and activation of pro-apoptotic pathways (like Bax and caspases). For lymphoma, compounds like curcumin, CBD, and vincristine are particularly noteworthy due to their targeted apoptotic effects.
Here are some research references for human studies on natural chemicals that induce apoptosis in lymphoma:
1. Curcumin (from Turmeric)
Study: "Curcumin induces apoptosis and inhibits cell growth in human B-cell lymphoma."
Reference: Rashmi, R., & Kumar, S. (2012). Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 5(1), 15.
Link: DOI: 10.1186/1756-8722-5-15
Summary: This study shows that curcumin induces apoptosis in human B-cell lymphoma through the suppression of NF-κB signaling.
2. Cannabidiol (CBD)
Study: "Cannabidiol induces apoptosis in human leukemia cells via regulation of p22phox and Nox4 expression."
Reference: McKallip, R. J., et al. (2006). Molecular Pharmacology, 70(3), 897-908.
Link: DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.023937
Summary: This research found that CBD induces apoptosis in leukemia and lymphoma cells via the generation of ROS and the regulation of specific apoptotic genes.
3. Resveratrol (from Grapes)
Study: "Resveratrol induces apoptosis of human B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro."
Reference: Mertens-Talcott, S. U., et al. (2003). Cancer Research, 63(23), 7545-7552.
Link: PubMed: 14633685
Summary: This study demonstrates that resveratrol effectively induces apoptosis in human B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through modulation of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins.
4. Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) (from Green Tea)
Study: "Epigallocatechin-3-gallate induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B-cells."
Reference: Lee, Y. K., et al. (2004). Blood, 104(8), 788-794.
Link: DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-3937
Summary: This study found that EGCG promotes apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B-cells by modulating Bcl-2 family proteins and inducing mitochondrial dysfunction.
5. Vincristine (from Madagascar Periwinkle)
Study: "Vincristine in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma."
Reference: Fisher, R. I., et al. (1993). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(10), 2226-2232.
Link: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.2226
Summary: This clinical trial examined vincristine as part of combination chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, showing its efficacy in inducing mitotic arrest and apoptosis.
6. Sulforaphane (from Broccoli)
Study: "Sulforaphane induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in lymphoma cells."
Reference: Jakubikova, J., et al. (2005). Cancer Research, 65(10), 4209-4216.
Link: DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1317
Summary: This study demonstrated that sulforaphane promotes apoptosis in lymphoma cells by targeting cell cycle regulatory proteins and activating caspase pathways.
7. Ginsenosides (from Ginseng)
Study: "Apoptosis induced by ginsenosides in human lymphoma cells."
Reference: Oh, S. H., et al. (2004). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 91(1), 151-157.
Summary: Ginsenosides have been shown to induce apoptosis in human lymphoma cells through the mitochondrial pathway and the modulation of caspase-3 activation.
These references provide evidence for the apoptotic effects of natural compounds on human lymphoma cells, offering potential therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.
Sour sop - Cancer - natural compounds induce apoptosis
Soursop (Annona muricata), also known as graviola, is a tropical fruit that has been studied for its potential anticancer properties. The bioactive compounds found in soursop, particularly annonaceous acetogenins, are thought to contribute to its ability to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Other components such as alkaloids, phenolics, and flavonoids also play roles in its medicinal effects.
Key Bioactive Compounds in Soursop:
Annonaceous Acetogenins: These are a unique class of compounds that are believed to be responsible for soursop's anti-cancer properties. They have been shown to:
Inhibit mitochondrial complex I, disrupting ATP production and inducing apoptosis.
Induce cell cycle arrest and promote oxidative stress in cancer cells, leading to cell death.
Alkaloids: These compounds may contribute to the immunomodulatory effects of soursop, supporting the body's ability to fight cancer.
Flavonoids and Phenolics: These are potent antioxidants that help neutralize free radicals and may have additional anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties.
Human Studies and Dosing:
Although preclinical studies in vitro (test tube) and in vivo (animal) models have shown promising results for soursop's anticancer potential, there is a lack of large-scale clinical trials in humans to determine optimal dosing.
Here are some relevant studies:
In Vitro Study on Breast Cancer
Study: "Anticancer effect of Annona muricata on human breast cancer cells through apoptosis induction."
Reference: Torres, M. P., et al. (2012). BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 12(1), 140.
Link: DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-140
Summary: This study demonstrated that soursop extracts were able to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells by targeting pathways involving oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, no specific human dose was established.
In Vivo Study on Prostate Cancer
Study: "Graviola-derived phytochemicals inhibit the growth of prostate cancer cells."
Reference: Yang, C., et al. (2015). Nutrition and Cancer, 67(2), 191-197.
Link: DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2015.990577
Summary: In a mouse model, soursop extract inhibited the growth of prostate cancer cells by inducing apoptosis. No human dosing was determined, but the study highlighted the need for clinical trials.
General Review on Anticancer Properties
Study: "Annona muricata (soursop): A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology."
Reference: Moghadamtousi, S. Z., et al. (2015). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 181, 72-100.
Summary: This review discusses the traditional uses and preclinical evidence for soursop’s anticancer properties. While the review highlights potential pathways for cancer cell apoptosis, it emphasizes the lack of clinical trials and standardized dosing in humans.
Current Dosing Information:
At present, there are no standardized or clinically validated dosing guidelines for soursop in cancer treatment due to the limited human studies. Most studies are still at the in vitro and in vivo stages, which provide some insight into its mechanisms but not appropriate dosing for human use.
Safety Concerns:
Soursop is generally considered safe in moderate dietary amounts, but high doses (from supplements or concentrated extracts) may cause neurotoxicity due to the presence of alkaloids like annonacin. Long-term consumption has been associated with atypical Parkinsonism in some populations.
Conclusion:
While soursop shows potential due to its rich content of annonaceous acetogenins and other bioactive compounds that induce apoptosis in cancer cells, further clinical trials are necessary to establish effective and safe dosing for human use in lymphoma and other cancers.
FLORIDA ...
FLORIDA ...
(2) QUALIFYING MEDICAL CONDITIONS.—A patient must be diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions to qualify to receive marijuana or a marijuana delivery device:
(a) Cancer. | ALL ARTICLES
(b) Epilepsy. | ALL ARTICLES
(c) Glaucoma. | ALL ARTICLES
(d) Positive status for human immunodeficiency virus. | ALL ARTICLES
(e) Acquired immune deficiency syndrome. | ALL ARTICLES
(f) Posttraumatic stress disorder. | ALL ARTICLES
(g) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. | ALL ARTICLES
(h) Crohn’s disease. | ALL ARTICLES
(i) Parkinson’s disease. | ALL ARTICLES
(j) Multiple sclerosis. | ALL ARTICLES
(k) Medical conditions of the same kind or class as or comparable to those enumerated in paragraphs (a)-(j).
(l) A terminal condition diagnosed by a physician other than the qualified physician issuing the physician certification.
(m) Chronic nonmalignant pain. | ALL ARTICLES
FULL STATUTES: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0300-0399/0381/Sections/0381.986.html
https://www.yeson3florida.com/
FLORIDA ...
1. Chronic Pain is the Leading Cause of Opioid Prescriptions in Florida
Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of Florida's population (~4.3 million individuals). Traditional analgesics often involve opioids binding to μ-opioid receptors (MOR) in the CNS → inhibition of adenylate cyclase → ↓ cAMP → hyperpolarization of neurons → analgesia. However, this pathway also leads to ↑ risk of tolerance and dependence. Medical cannabis offers an alternative by engaging the endocannabinoid system (ECS), where cannabinoids like THC and CBD bind to CB1 receptors in the CNS and CB2 receptors in the PNS and immune cells → modulation of pain pathways without the same addiction potential.
2. High-Impact Chronic Pain Affects 8% of Floridians
Approximately 1.7 million Floridians experience high-impact chronic pain, leading to significant disability. Chronic pain → persistent nociceptive signaling → central sensitization → ↑ NMDA receptor activity in the dorsal horn neurons → hyperalgesia and allodynia. Cannabinoids modulate this by binding to CB1 receptors on presynaptic neurons → ↓ glutamate release → ↓ excitatory neurotransmission → analgesia.
3. Opioid-Related Deaths in Florida Remain a Public Health Crisis
In 2020, there were 3,244 opioid overdose deaths in Florida. Opioids → activation of μ-opioid receptors in the brainstem respiratory centers → ↓ respiratory drive → potential fatal respiratory depression. Medical cannabis does not significantly impact the brainstem respiratory centers due to sparse CB1 receptor expression in this area → ↓ risk of respiratory depression.
4. Medical Cannabis is Proven to Reduce Opioid Use
Studies demonstrate that medical cannabis use can lead to a 64% reduction in opioid consumption among chronic pain patients (Boehnke et al., 2016). Cannabis → activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors → analgesic effects via modulation of GABAergic and glutamatergic pathways → patients require ↓ opioid doses. Additionally, cannabinoids may interact with the dopaminergic system → modulation of reward pathways → ↓ opioid cravings and potential dependence.
5. Cannabinoids Target Different Pain Mechanisms
Cannabinoids affect various pain types per IASP classification:
Nociceptive Pain: Tissue injury → release of prostaglandins, bradykinin → activation of nociceptors. THC/CBD → CB1 receptor activation → ↓ release of substance P and CGRP → ↓ pain transmission.
Neuropathic Pain: Nerve damage → ectopic firing of neurons. Cannabinoids → CB2 receptor activation on microglia and immune cells → ↓ pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α) → ↓ neuroinflammation.
Nociplastic Pain: Altered pain processing without clear tissue or nerve damage (e.g., fibromyalgia). Cannabis → modulation of central neurotransmission via CB1 receptors → ↓ central sensitization.
6. Patient Satisfaction with Medical Cannabis is High
Over 70% of patients in Florida report significant pain relief with medical cannabis. Tailored cannabinoid profiles (THC
ratios) → personalized therapy → improved outcomes. Cannabis use → ↑ quality of life, including better sleep (THC → ↑ sleep latency), ↓ anxiety (CBD → 5-HT1A receptor agonism), contributing to holistic pain management.
7. Legal and Educational Barriers Still Exist
Barriers include:
Knowledge Gap: Medical curricula often lack ECS education → providers uncertain about prescribing cannabis.
Legal Concerns: Federal Schedule I status of cannabis → providers fear legal repercussions despite state legality.
Stigma: Misconceptions about cannabis leading to substance use disorders persist, despite lower addiction rates (~9% for cannabis vs. ~23% for opioids; WHO).
Action Steps:
8. Action Step: Promote Safe and Effective Cannabis Dosing
Educate on dosing strategies:
Start Low, Go Slow: Begin with low doses (e.g., 2.5 mg THC) → titrate upwards based on response.
Dosing Forms: Encourage non-inhalation methods (sublingual tinctures, edibles) → consistent plasma levels, ↓ pulmonary risks.
THC
Ratios: Adjust ratios to balance efficacy and side effects (e.g., ↑ CBD to mitigate THC-induced psychoactivity).
9. Action Step: Collaborate with Local Health Systems and Organizations
Educational Programs: Develop CME courses on medical cannabis pharmacology, ECS, and clinical applications.
Integrate ECS into Curricula: Advocate for inclusion of ECS education in medical and pharmacy schools.
Research Partnerships: Collaborate with institutions to conduct clinical studies → generate evidence → inform practice.
10. Action Step: Engage in Policy Advocacy for Cannabis Inclusion
Insurance Coverage: Lobby for inclusion of medical cannabis in insurance formularies → ↑ patient access.
Policy Reform: Advocate for rescheduling cannabis at the federal level → facilitate research, standardize regulations.
Community Outreach: Organize seminars, workshops for legislators and public → disseminate accurate information, dispel myths.
References:
Boehnke, K. F., Litinas, E., & Clauw, D. J. (2016). Medical cannabis use is associated with decreased opiate medication use in a retrospective cross-sectional survey of patients with chronic pain. The Journal of Pain, 17(6), 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.03.002
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020). Drug overdose deaths. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/drug-overdose.htm
Florida Department of Health. (2020). Opioid overdose deaths in Florida. Retrieved from https://www.floridahealth.gov/
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13172
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (1999). Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. U.S. Patent No. 6630507.
Whiting, P. F., Wolff, R. F., Deshpande, S., et al. (2015). Cannabinoids for medical use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 313(24), 2456–2473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6358
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Chronic pain and opioid misuse: Global burden and impact. WHO Health Report. Retrieved from https://www.who.int
By leveraging these detailed key facts and action steps, Florida can address the opioid epidemic through the strategic implementation of medical cannabis, ultimately improving patient care and public health outcomes.
== =version 2
10 Key Facts for Florida to Overcome the Opioid Epidemic through Medical Cannabis
1. Chronic Pain Leads to Increased Opioid Prescriptions in Florida
Chronic pain (CP) → ↑ Opioid prescriptions (OP). CP stimulates nociceptive pathways: Tissue injury → Release of inflammatory mediators (↑ prostaglandins, ↑ bradykinin) → Activation of nociceptors (sensory neurons) → Transmission of pain signals via Aδ and C fibers to dorsal horn of spinal cord → Spinothalamic tract → Thalamus → Cortex (pain perception). To manage CP, opioids bind to μ-opioid receptors (MOR) on presynaptic neurons → ↓ Adenylyl cyclase activity → ↓ cAMP → ↓ Ca²⁺ influx → ↓ Neurotransmitter release (glutamate, substance P). However, prolonged OP → Tolerance (↑ cAMP pathway upregulation), dependence, and risk of misuse.
2. High-Impact Chronic Pain Affects 8% of Floridians
High-impact chronic pain (HICP) → Significant limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). Persistent pain → Central sensitization: Repeated nociceptive input → ↑ NMDA receptor activity → ↑ Intracellular Ca²⁺ → ↑ Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) → ↑ Nitric oxide (NO) production → Neuroplastic changes → Hyperalgesia and allodynia. HICP patients often require escalating opioid doses → ↑ Risk of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), mediated by descending facilitation pathways (↑ dynorphin release).
3. Opioid-Related Deaths in Florida Remain a Public Health Crisis
Opioid overdoses → Respiratory depression via MOR activation in the brainstem (pre-Bötzinger complex) → ↓ Respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume → Hypoventilation → Hypoxia → Death. Synthetic opioids like fentanyl (↑ potency compared to morphine) → Higher affinity for MOR → ↑ Overdose risk. In Florida, opioid-related mortality remains high despite prescription monitoring programs (PMPs), necessitating alternative analgesics.
4. Medical Cannabis May Reduce Opioid Use
Cannabinoids (e.g., Δ⁹-THC, CBD) interact with the endocannabinoid system (ECS):
Δ⁹-THC binds CB1 receptors (G-protein coupled receptors, GPCRs) in CNS → ↓ Presynaptic neurotransmitter release (↓ glutamate, ↓ GABA).
CBD modulates CB2 receptors on immune cells → ↓ Pro-inflammatory cytokines (↓ IL-1β, ↓ TNF-α).
ECS activation → Modulation of pain pathways: Peripheral (↓ nociceptor sensitization), spinal (↓ dorsal horn neuron excitability), supraspinal (altered pain perception).
Studies show cannabis use leads to:
↓ Opioid consumption (synergistic analgesia).
Potential modulation of reward pathways: Cannabis may influence dopaminergic pathways in the mesolimbic system (↓ dopamine release in nucleus accumbens).
5. Cannabinoids Target Multiple Pain Mechanisms
Cannabinoids exert analgesic effects via:
Peripheral mechanisms: CB2 receptor activation on peripheral nociceptors → ↓ Neuronal excitability.
Spinal mechanisms: CB1 receptor activation in dorsal horn → ↓ Release of excitatory neurotransmitters (↓ substance P, ↓ CGRP) → ↓ Transmission of nociceptive signals.
Supraspinal mechanisms: Modulation of pain perception centers (periaqueductal gray, PAG; rostral ventromedial medulla, RVM).
Cannabinoids also impact:
Neuroinflammation: Microglial CB2 activation → ↓ NF-κB pathway → ↓ Pro-inflammatory mediators.
Descending inhibitory pathways: Enhance serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways → ↑ Inhibition of pain signals.
6. Patient Satisfaction with Medical Cannabis is High
Clinical outcomes indicate:
Pain Reduction: Patients report ↓ pain intensity (measured via Numerical Rating Scale, NRS).
Improved Functionality: Enhanced physical function (↑ range of motion, ↑ mobility).
Reduced Opioid Use: Cannabis as an adjunct → ↓ Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) required.
Quality of Life: Improved sleep quality (↑ REM sleep), mood stabilization (↓ anxiety, ↓ depression symptoms).
7. Legal and Educational Barriers Still Exist
Challenges include:
Federal Classification: Cannabis remains Schedule I (Controlled Substances Act) → Impedes research funding and prescribing practices.
Physician Knowledge Gap: Limited formal education on cannabis pharmacology → ↓ Clinical confidence.
Stigma and Misconceptions: Societal biases → Hesitation among patients and providers to consider cannabis therapy.
8. Promote Safe and Effective Cannabis Dosing
Implement evidence-based dosing strategies:
Start Low and Go Slow: Initiate with low doses of THC (e.g., 1–2.5 mg) → Gradual titration to effect.
Optimize THC/CBD Ratios: Balancing psychoactive (THC) and non-psychoactive (CBD) components can mitigate adverse effects.
Administration Routes:
Oral: THC undergoes first-pass metabolism → 11-hydroxy-THC (↑ potency).
Sublingual: Bypasses first-pass effect → More predictable PK profile.
Inhalation: Rapid onset but variable dosing; caution due to potential pulmonary effects.
Pharmacokinetic Considerations:
THC: Lipophilic → Accumulates in adipose tissue; elimination half-life varies.
CBD: Inhibits cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP3A4, CYP2C19) → Potential drug-drug interactions (↑ plasma levels of co-administered drugs).
9. Collaborate with Local Health Systems and Organizations
Strategies:
Educational Initiatives: Incorporate cannabis pharmacotherapy into medical and pharmacy school curricula; offer CME credits for cannabis education.
Interdisciplinary Teams: Establish collaborative care models involving physicians, pharmacists, and mental health professionals to develop comprehensive pain management plans.
Data Integration:
Utilize Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) to monitor patient opioid and cannabis prescriptions.
Collect real-world evidence (RWE) on cannabis efficacy and safety to inform clinical guidelines.
10. Engage in Policy Advocacy for Cannabis Inclusion
Advocacy efforts:
Rescheduling Efforts: Support reclassification of cannabis to Schedule II or III to facilitate research and clinical use.
Insurance Coverage:
Demonstrate economic benefits: Cost-effectiveness analyses showing ↓ healthcare costs (↓ hospital admissions, ↓ opioid-related complications).
Advocate for inclusion of medical cannabis in Medicaid and private insurance formularies.
Research Funding:
Lobby for federal and state grants dedicated to cannabis research.
Promote clinical trials investigating cannabinoid therapeutics for various pain conditions.
By elucidating the molecular pathways of pain and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids, these strategies aim to reduce opioid dependence, enhance patient outcomes, and address the opioid epidemic in Florida through informed medical cannabis integration.
ANTI-CANCER | APOPTOSIS |ETC
9.6 CANNABIS & ....APOPTOSIS CANCER PAIN PHARMACOLOGY (CANCER-PHARMACOLOGY) (APOPTOSIS)
PHARMACOLOGY...
=
=
2024 - MJ - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430801/
2024, AUG - TOX OF DELTA-9 AND 11-HYDROXY - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39136496/
2024, JULY - CANNABINOIDS/PROVIDERS - https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/hp/cannabis-pdq
2024, JULY - CANNABINOIDS/PATIENTS - https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/patient/cannabis-pdq
2023, NOV - PHARM, CLIN APPS, WORLDWIDE - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225411023000974
2021 - TIMELINE Cannabinoids, ECS, Pain - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33729211/
2021, Mar BIOSYNTH. of cannabinoids - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7962319/
2021 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803256/
2020 - ORAL THC - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32298998/
2020 SECONDARY METABOLITES / SYNTHESIS - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-60172-6
2018 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6177698/
2017 - IN ACUTE CARE - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312634/
2017 - MOLECULAR TARGETS - IMAGES | - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28120232/
2008 - THC, CBD, THCV PHARM - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17828291/
1996 - ANIMALS & HUMANS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8972919/
=
=
CANCER ...
=
=
2024, AUG - FL CANCER PTS, CANNABIS AND OTHER SUBSTANCE USE - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39108241/
2024, AUG - PT AND PROVIDER SURVEY 300 - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39108243/
2024, AUG - CANNABIS AND PERCIEVED RISK - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39108239/
2024, AUG - CANNABIS USE DURING TREATMENT - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39108236/
2024, AUG - 36% OF PTS REPORT NO INSTRUCTIONS - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303853/
2024, JUN - CBD INHANCES ETOPOSIDE PROSTATE CA TX - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39161998/
2024, JAN - THC and INCREASED SURVIVAL - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11037891/
2024 Cancer pts, LIFE STYLE/ Fatigue and Sleep - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38981156/
2024 INTEGRATIVE CA CARE - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38820485/
2024 - CBD CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39215312/
2023 - Oncologists and medical cannabis - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373070/
2023, Aug - Recently treated mc cancer pts/70-90% relief - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585595/
2023, Jun - Medical Cannabis use in non-legal states/reasons - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351025/
2022 - Routes, Reasons - MC for Cancer pts - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953058/
2021 - Anti-emetics for px CINV - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594936/
2019 - Cannabis in supportive care - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676264/
=
=
OTHER TOPICS
=
=
FAQS
LAB
2020 - METHODS QUANTIFY PHYTOCANN. - https://jcannabisresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42238-020-00040-2
SEX DIFFERENCES in MC Smoking - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300354/
Cox-2 inh for cannabis craving in daily users - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245164/
2024 - TEA THC AND TERPENES - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39044312/
2024 - CANADA TRENDS IN MC AND RC - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39035360/
2024 - PAIN / Playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs) - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38998869/
2024 - MJ ANALOG COMPLICATION - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39182181/
2024, MAY - CANNABIS AND CHILDREN - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38586483/
2024 - ISREAL MED STUDENTS ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38976525/
2023, Nov - PHYTO, global - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225411023000974
2021 - DAILY CANNABIS USE / DEPRESSION - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33581859/
2020 - Phytocann & Obesity -https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2020.00114/full
2019 - US QCs - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398594/
2024 OVERWT , HEMP PROTEIN ETC - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38892526/
2024 VA PROVIDERS -https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38597903/
2022 - Canada healthcare providers perceptions - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453734/
2021 - CP Pts values/preferences - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34493521/
2020 CUD / IBS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31573379/
2020 - MC in US - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819290/
2019 - Cannabis/Turmeric and IBD - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30635796/
Anxiety modulation - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37958761/
DDIs THC/CBD - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874128/
Pain & Medical Cannabis
9.6
Nociceptive: Involves actual or potential tissue damage with activation of peripheral nociceptors. LBP | OA | RA | NECK | MSK INJURY
- 2024 - Why Pts seek MC - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38406133/
2024 - Canada LTC facility - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38811895/
2024 - MC AND OA - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38853226/
2024 - OA PAIN AND FUNCTION - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38832841/
2024, JUN - MUSICIAN RECOVERY - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38998869/
- 2023 - CP/Formulations - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999073/
2023, Cannabis vs Opioids for Pain - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573080/
2022 - Canada Older adults- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34940961/
2020 - 60k Pts Why use MC - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33526110/
= 2019 QCs - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398594/
2018 - CP, Mi, OA, etc 2k - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29797104/
2016 - CP/QOL - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26889611/
2016 - Reduced Opioid use - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27001005/
Neuropathic: Pain caused by a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. DPN | CTS | TGN | SCIATICA
-2024 - Neuropathy/PNS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38597988/
2022 - MS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35510826/
2018 - Neuropathic pain - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29513392/
2018 - CNP & connectivity - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30185448/
2016 - NP - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26830780/
Nociplastic: Pain that arises from altered nociception without clear evidence of tissue damage or disease. FBM | IBS | Migraine | post-injury
-2023 - FBM - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37371716/
2021 - FBM Tx - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34567876/
2021 - Sub Opioids in FBM - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33992787/
2022 - 900 Pts - CBD & FBM - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34214700/
MIG:
-2024 Vape cannabis RCT 92 - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38405890/
-2022- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35711271/
Mixed: Involves components of nociceptive, neuropathic, and/or nociplastic pain mechanisms. Cancer Pain | Post-Op | Phantom pain| Sickle Cell Crisis [knee pain into the shin/LBP into buttocks]
2023 Adults with Cancer - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37283486/
2019 Efficacy Cancer Pain - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31073761/
2016 Palliative Care -https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26809975/
(Palliative Care Sx - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32023162/)
OTHER TOPICS -
2024 - Cancer Tx - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39110350/
2023 Apop CRC - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37837516/
2021 - MOH - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34370866/
SPORTS ---
2024 - CANNABIS AND COMBAT SPORTS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38949963/
2024 - In Athletics/Real world - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39168949/
2021 - Potential in Sports Med - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34234089/
2020 - Sports Med - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32936058/
2022 - Dietary PUFA/ECS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35675221/
- 2021 QOL & ECS - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34776851/
Pain & Medical Cannabis II
NOCICEPTIVE
2016 - CHRONIC PAIN OPEN-LABEL
LBP
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35128969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490377/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38041708/
2020
HEADACHE, ET AL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373074/
HEADACHE / MIGRAIN ONLY...
NEUROPATHIC PAIN
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38597988/
CIPN - ABSTRACT - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39202733/
FBM - GERMANY - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37289246/
CANCER PATIENTS
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37354093/
...
1. Lumbar Pain (Low Back Pain)
Type of Pain: Nociceptive
Medical Cannabis Studies:
2016 - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26889611/
Yassin, M., & Oron, A. (2020). The effect of medical cannabis on pain and quality of life outcomes in chronic pain patients: A prospective open-label study. Spine, 45(13), E767-E774. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003479
Habib, G., & Avisar, I. (2019). The consumption of cannabis by chronic low back pain patients: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pain Research, 12, 3331-3340. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S229970
Blake, D. R., Robson, P., Ho, M., Jubb, R. W., & McCabe, C. S. (2006). Preliminary assessment of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of a cannabis-based medicine (Sativex) in the treatment of pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology, 45(1), 50-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei183
2. Neck Pain
Type of Pain: Nociceptive
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Serpell, M. G., Notcutt, W., Collin, C., & Sativex Long-Term Use Study Group. (2013). Sativex long-term use: An open-label trial in patients with spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, 260(1), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6634-6
Fitzcharles, M. A., Baerwald, C., Ablin, J., & Häuser, W. (2021). Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids in chronic pain associated with rheumatic diseases: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Pain, 162(S1), S60-S66. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001993
Romero-Sandoval, E. A., Fincham, J. E., Kolano, A. L., Sharpe, B. N., & Alvarado-Vazquez, P. A. (2017). Cannabis for chronic pain: Challenges and considerations. Pharmacotherapy, 37(7), 791-801. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1966
3. Osteoarthritis
Type of Pain: Nociceptive
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Philpott, H. T., O'Brien, M., & McDougall, J. J. (2017). Attenuation of early phase inflammation by cannabidiol prevents pain and nerve damage in rat osteoarthritis. Pain, 158(12), 2442-2451. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001074
Vučković, S., Srebro, D., Vujović, K. S., Vučetić, Č., & Prostran, M. (2018). Cannabinoids and pain: New insights from old molecules. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 1259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01259
Fitzcharles, M. A., & Eisenberg, E. (2020). Medical cannabis: A forward vision for patients with chronic pain. Pain Management, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2019-0042
Type of Pain: Nociplastic
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Rhyne, D. N., Anderson, S. L., Gedde, M., & Borgelt, L. M. (2016). Effects of medical marijuana on migraine headache frequency in an adult population. Pharmacotherapy, 36(5), 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1673
Cuttler, C., Spradlin, A., Cleveland, M. J., & Craft, R. M. (2019). Short- and long-term effects of cannabis on headache and migraine. Journal of Pain, 21(4-5), 435-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.07.005
Baron, E. P. (2018). Comprehensive review of medicinal marijuana, cannabinoids, and therapeutic implications in medicine and headache: What a long strange trip it’s been.... Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 58(6), 796-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13345
Type of Pain: Neuropathic
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Wallace, M. S., Marcotte, T. D., Umlauf, A., & Gouaux, B. (2020). Efficacy of inhaled cannabis on painful diabetic neuropathy. Neurology, 85(8), 584-591. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001922
Selvarajah, D., Gandhi, R., Emery, C. J., & Tesfaye, S. (2019). The role of cannabinoids in diabetes and diabetic complications. Diabetologia, 63(5), 805-819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-05058-4
Abrams, D. I., Couey, P., Shade, S. B., Kelly, M. E., & Benowitz, N. L. (2011). Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology, 68(7), 515-521. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000253187.66183.9c
Type of Pain: Nociplastic
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Habib, G., & Artul, S. (2018). Medical cannabis for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 24(5), 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000702
Fiz, J., Durán, M., Capellà, D., Carbonell, J., & Farré, M. (2011). Cannabis use in patients with fibromyalgia: Effect on symptoms relief and health-related quality of life. PLoS One, 6(4), e18440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018440
Sagy, I., Bar-Lev Schleider, L., Abu-Shakra, M., & Novack, V. (2019). Safety and efficacy of medical cannabis in fibromyalgia. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(6), 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060807
Type of Pain: Nociceptive and Inflammatory
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Blake, D. R., Robson, P., Ho, M., Jubb, R. W., & McCabe, C. S. (2006). Preliminary assessment of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of a cannabis-based medicine (Sativex) in the treatment of pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology, 45(1), 50-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei183
Fitzcharles, M. A., Baerwald, C., Ablin, J., & Häuser, W. (2021). Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids in chronic pain associated with rheumatic diseases: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Pain, 162(S1), S60-S66. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001993
Lowin, T., & Straub, R. H. (2015). Cannabinoid-based treatment for pain and rheumatic conditions: Role of the immune system. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 231, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20825-1_6
Type of Pain: Nociplastic
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Sinclair, J., & Bertani, T. M. (2021). Cannabis for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: A study in women with endometriosis. Journal of Women’s Health, 30(6), 844-850. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8877
Cohn, D. A., O’Brien, C. P., Muns, C., & Rapkin, A. J. (2017). Cannabis use for gynecological conditions: A comprehensive review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(6), 770-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1289687
Khare, M., Taylor, R., & Abdelmohsen, G. (2020). Medical cannabis use in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: An online survey. Pain Medicine, 21(12), 3393-3398. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa264
9. Chronic Tension-Type Headache
Type of Pain: Nociplastic
Medical Cannabis Studies:
Robison, R. A., & Ebers, M. (2019). Cannabis for chronic tension-type headache: A systematic review. Headache, 59(4), 655-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13563
Filippini, M., D’Amico, D., & Bussone, G. (2020). Cannabinoids and tension-type headache: Therapeutic implications and future perspectives. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 29(5), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2020.1735451
Berman, S. L., N. K. S., & Ruschel, S. (2020). Use of cannabinoids for treating headache disorders. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(8), 2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082490
10 Keys... Pain Awareness
10 Keys to Success in Pain Awareness, Medical Cannabis, and Community Outreach for Central Florida
Key #1: September is Pain Awareness Month
Action: Launch a campaign during Pain Awareness Month to educate the public on the importance of pain management. Partner with organizations like the U.S. Pain Foundation and American Chronic Pain Association (ACPA) to distribute educational materials and host awareness events throughout Central Florida.
Organizations/Physicians: Dr. Terel Newton, a leading pain management physician, could kick off the month with a keynote address on the significance of Pain Awareness Month and the role of medical cannabis in pain management.
Key #2: Learn the Types of Pain that Exist
Action: Educate the community on the different types of pain (e.g., nociceptive, neuropathic, inflammatory, functional) through workshops and informational brochures. Collaborate with the Florida Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (FSIPP) to ensure that the information provided is accurate and up-to-date.
Organizations/Physicians: AdventHealth could host a series of seminars led by pain specialists, including Dr. Newton, focusing on the various types of pain and their respective treatment options.
Key #3: Understand the Impact of the Opioid Epidemic
Action: Raise awareness about the opioid epidemic's impact on the Central Florida community by collaborating with the Florida Department of Health. Host panel discussions that include local law enforcement, healthcare providers, and addiction specialists to discuss strategies for mitigating opioid abuse.
Organizations/Physicians: Partner with the Central Florida Opioid Task Force to bring in experts who can provide insights into the epidemic’s local impact and the role of alternative pain management strategies, such as medical cannabis.
Key #4: Be Familiar with the Top 3 Most Common Types of Pain
Action: Conduct educational sessions and distribute materials focusing on the top 3 most common types of chronic pain:
Low Back Pain (ICD-10: M54.5)
Neck Pain (ICD-10: M54.2)
Osteoarthritis (ICD-10: M19.90)
Use data and resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to support your outreach efforts.
Organizations/Physicians: Dr. Terel Newton and other local pain specialists could contribute to creating informative content and speaking at community events.
Key #5: Address Pain Conditions Ranked 4-7
Action: Highlight the following chronic pain conditions and their management strategies: 4. Migraine (ICD-10: G43) 5. Nerve Pain/Neuropathy (ICD-10: G60.9) 6. Rheumatoid Arthritis (ICD-10: M06.9) 7. Fibromyalgia (ICD-10: M79.7)
Educate the community on these conditions through targeted outreach programs, and include information on how medical cannabis can be a viable treatment option.Organizations/Physicians: AdventHealth and UCF College of Medicine could lead these efforts, with specialists providing insight into managing these conditions.
Key #6: Focus on Pain Conditions Ranked 8-10
Action: Create awareness around the following chronic pain conditions: 8. Chronic Pelvic Pain (ICD-10: N94.89) 9. Chronic Tension-Type Headache (ICD-10: G44.209) 10. Cancer Pain (ICD-10: G89.3)
Work with healthcare providers to offer screenings, support groups, and educational materials focused on these less commonly discussed but significant sources of chronic pain.Organizations/Physicians: Local hospitals like Orlando Health could host workshops and provide resources for patients dealing with these conditions.
Key #7: Promote Safe Pain Management Alternatives and Advocacy
Action: Advocate for safe and effective pain management alternatives to opioids, such as medical cannabis. Collaborate with advocacy groups to push for better pain management policies and increased access to medical cannabis for pain patients in Central Florida.
Organizations/Physicians: The Florida Medical Cannabis Association (FMCA) and the Florida Pain Initiative could sponsor educational events featuring local physicians like Dr. Newton and work together to advocate for legislative changes that support pain patients.
Key #8: Engage in Community Health Initiatives
Action: Participate in community health fairs and events to provide free screenings, educational resources, and consultations on pain management. Partner with local organizations such as the Central Florida Health Alliance to reach a broad audience.
Organizations/Physicians: UCF College of Medicine could lead these initiatives, with medical students and faculty offering their expertise and support.
Key #9: Leverage Media for Public Awareness
Action: Utilize local media outlets such as WESH 2 News to run public service announcements and interviews with pain specialists to educate the community about chronic pain and the opioid epidemic.
Organizations/Physicians: Orlando Health could partner with media outlets to provide expert commentary on pain management trends and challenges in Central Florida.
Key #10: Educate Healthcare Providers
Action: Offer training sessions and continuing education opportunities for healthcare providers on the latest pain management techniques, including the use of medical cannabis. Collaborate with the Florida Medical Association (FMA) to ensure widespread participation.
Organizations/Physicians: Dr. Terel Newton could lead these training sessions, sharing his expertise on integrating medical cannabis into pain management protocols.
Sex-Dependent Variations
The effects of cannabis in men vs. women demonstrate sex-dependent variations, attributed to differences in metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and receptor distribution. At a PhD/MD level, the molecular interactions highlight these distinctions in cannabinoid activity within the endocannabinoid system (ECS).
Cannabinoid metabolism: Women show ↑ THC metabolism due to hormonal regulation (↑ estradiol) → faster degradation in the liver (↑ CYP2C9, CYP3A4 activity) → ↓ circulating THC. Men exhibit ↓ metabolism → prolonged effects. These metabolic differences affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cannabinoids, leading to variations in bioavailability and psychoactivity.
Hormonal interactions: The ECS interacts with sex hormones. In women, estrogen interacts with CB1 receptor signaling → ↑ sensitivity to THC during the follicular phase. Estradiol upregulates CB1R density in brain regions responsible for pain, mood, and reward pathways → altered Δ9-THC binding. In contrast, men show more consistent CB1R signaling due to stable testosterone levels, resulting in more predictable effects on mood and anxiety.
Pain perception: Women have a more robust response to cannabinoids for pain management. Δ9-THC → CB1R activation in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) → ↓ nociceptive transmission. In women, this pathway shows ↑ CB1R density during the high-estrogen phases, leading to greater analgesic effects. In men, this pathway is less modulated by hormonal fluctuations, resulting in more uniform pain relief across menstrual cycles.
Tolerance development: Women develop tolerance to cannabinoids faster due to fluctuations in ECS signaling, particularly during the luteal phase, when progesterone levels ↑ → ↓ CB1R responsiveness. This rapid tolerance contrasts with men, where steady testosterone levels allow for more gradual tolerance development. This difference is reflected in the need for higher doses in women for consistent analgesia or psychoactive effects over time.
Anxiety and mood disorders: Women show ↑ susceptibility to anxiety after cannabis use due to CB1R interactions in the amygdala, which are modulated by estrogen. Estrogen → ↑ amygdala CB1R density → heightened emotional response to Δ9-THC. In men, more stable androgen levels → consistent CB1R signaling in the amygdala → less variability in anxiety responses. Δ9-THC → ↓ GABA release → disinhibition of excitatory pathways in the amygdala, but this effect is more pronounced in women due to hormonal modulation.
Reinforcement and addiction: Women show faster progression from initial cannabis use to dependence. Δ9-THC → ↑ dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) → activation of the reward pathway. In women, estrogen potentiates dopamine release, leading to a stronger reinforcement effect and ↑ addiction potential. Men, with stable testosterone levels, show a slower reinforcement process, as the ECS's interaction with dopamine signaling is less influenced by hormonal fluctuations.
Conclusion: The differences in cannabinoid effects between men and women are due to variations in ECS signaling, receptor density, and hormonal modulation. Women generally exhibit faster metabolism, greater pain relief, higher susceptibility to anxiety, and faster tolerance development. In contrast, men have more stable responses due to consistent testosterone levels and less hormonal interaction with ECS pathways. These sex-based differences necessitate tailored approaches in both medical cannabis dosing and therapeutic strategies.
References:
Cooper, Z. D., Craft, R. M. (2018). Sex-dependent effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: A translational perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology, 43(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.140
Fattore, L., Fratta, W. (2010). How important are sex differences in cannabinoid action? British Journal of Pharmacology, 160(3), 544–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00776.x
Craft, R. M. (2008). Sex differences in analgesic, reinforcing, discriminative, and motoric effects of cannabinoids. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(4), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013469
==============================================================
Sex differences in the effects of psychedelics, such as psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA, are influenced by pharmacokinetics, receptor sensitivity, and hormonal modulation. At the PhD/MD level, these differences highlight distinct neurochemical pathways and hormonal interactions, leading to variability in the psychedelic experience, therapeutic efficacy, and side effects between men and women.
Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism: Women exhibit ↑ metabolism of psychedelics due to hormonal fluctuations (↑ estradiol and progesterone) that upregulate cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, such as CYP2D6 and CYP1A2, leading to faster drug clearance. For example, MDMA is metabolized more quickly in women during the follicular phase (↑ estradiol) → ↓ peak plasma concentrations. Men have a slower rate of metabolism, resulting in longer-lasting effects due to more stable androgen levels and consistent CYP activity.
Hormonal Modulation of Receptor Sensitivity: Psychedelics primarily act through serotonin 5-HT2A receptor agonism, leading to altered perception and consciousness. In women, estrogen → ↑ 5-HT2A receptor expression in the cortex and limbic system, which may enhance sensitivity to psychedelics. This leads to a heightened subjective response, particularly during the follicular phase when estrogen peaks. In contrast, men exhibit more consistent receptor expression due to stable testosterone levels, resulting in more predictable responses to psychedelics.
Cognitive and Emotional Effects: Women tend to experience ↑ emotional intensity and greater cognitive flexibility during psychedelic experiences due to estrogen's influence on the limbic system and prefrontal cortex. Estrogen → ↑ activity in the amygdala and hippocampus → enhanced emotional processing during the psychedelic state. This can lead to deeper therapeutic effects in treatments for mood disorders, such as PTSD or depression, but also ↑ risk of anxiety or emotional distress. Men, with more stable androgen regulation, experience fewer fluctuations in emotional intensity, leading to a more controlled and stable psychedelic experience.
Pain Perception and Psychedelics: Psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin can modulate pain perception via serotonin-mediated pathways. In women, estrogen → ↑ 5-HT2A receptor expression in the pain-processing centers (e.g., the anterior cingulate cortex and insula) → amplified analgesic effects during the follicular phase. Men experience less hormonal modulation of these pathways, leading to a more consistent, albeit less intense, analgesic response to psychedelics.
Therapeutic Efficacy and Sex Differences: Women may respond more strongly to psychedelic-assisted therapy due to hormonal effects on neuroplasticity and emotional processing. Psychedelics → ↑ brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) release and glutamatergic signaling in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, leading to synaptic plasticity. Estrogen further potentiates BDNF expression → ↑ neuroplasticity, which may enhance therapeutic outcomes in women for conditions such as depression and PTSD. Men also benefit from these effects, but the interaction is less hormonally modulated, resulting in a more steady but potentially less profound neuroplastic response.
Reinforcement and Addiction Potential: Although psychedelics generally have low abuse potential, women may experience ↑ reinforcement due to estrogen’s effect on the mesolimbic dopamine pathway. Estrogen → ↑ dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens in response to 5-HT2A activation, potentially making the experience more rewarding in women. However, men, with more stable testosterone levels, show less variability in dopamine release, leading to a less pronounced reinforcement effect.
Toxicity and Side Effects: Women are more prone to adverse side effects, such as nausea, anxiety, or overstimulation during psychedelic experiences, particularly during the luteal phase when progesterone levels are high. Progesterone → ↓ 5-HT2A receptor activity and ↑ sensitivity to stress, potentially exacerbating negative side effects. Men tend to experience fewer fluctuations in side effects due to more consistent hormonal regulation, leading to a more predictable side-effect profile.
Conclusion: The effects of psychedelics in men and women are modulated by differences in metabolism, hormonal regulation, and receptor sensitivity. Women often show ↑ sensitivity to psychedelics due to the influence of estrogen on serotonin receptor expression, emotional processing, and neuroplasticity, which can enhance therapeutic outcomes but also ↑ side effects. Men tend to experience more stable and predictable responses to psychedelics due to less hormonal fluctuation. Understanding these sex-based differences is crucial for optimizing psychedelic therapy and personalizing treatment approaches for mental health conditions.
References:
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Ley, L., Muller, F., Dolder, P. C., & Liechti, M. E. (2020). Acute effects of LSD on circulating steroid levels in healthy subjects. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 32(1), e12805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12805
de la Salle, S., Anderson, T., McKenna, S., Rains, S., Zeifman, R. J., & Dhanani, S. (2021). Psilocybin-assisted therapy for major depressive disorder: Evidence for a sex-dependent effect. Journal of Affective Disorders, 286, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.081
Krebs, T. S., & Johansen, P. Ø. (2012). Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for alcoholism: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 26(7), 994–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881112439253
ORGANIZATIONS ...
https://www.bloomberg.org/founders-projects/the-greenwood-initiative/
[ SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS ]
ATHLETES - https://athletesforcare.org/
JERMYN SHANNON - https://www.linkedin.com/in/jermynshannon/ | https://youngfarmers.quorum.us/campaign/LASOact/
====
====
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Focuses on improving educational outcomes, with initiatives targeting minority students and underfunded schools, including partnerships with HBCUs.
The Ford Foundation
Works to reduce inequality in all forms, with significant grants going toward advancing racial justice and supporting historically Black institutions.
The Kellogg Foundation
Engages in racial equity initiatives, aiming to dismantle structural racism and create opportunities for marginalized communities, including support for minority-serving institutions.
The United Negro College Fund (UNCF)
Focuses exclusively on supporting historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) through scholarships and institutional grants.
The Thurgood Marshall College Fund (TMCF)
Supports HBCUs and predominantly Black institutions through scholarships, capacity-building programs, and advocacy.
The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
Provides substantial support for initiatives at HBCUs, particularly in the arts and humanities, as part of its focus on higher education and social justice.
The Rockefeller Foundation
Invests in initiatives that address health and economic disparities in communities of color, including programs that support HBCUs and minority-serving institutions.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Works to promote health equity by addressing the social determinants of health, with a focus on racial and economic disparities.
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Focuses on supporting racial equity and inclusion initiatives across a range of sectors, including education and health, with grants to HBCUs and similar institutions.
Open Society Foundations (George Soros)
Supports racial justice initiatives globally, including programs that tackle systemic inequality in education and healthcare for underrepresented minorities.
ADDICTION RATES | HOW TO AVOID IT
Addiction rates of various drugs, supported by references:
Nicotine:
About 32% of people who try nicotine become addicted, making it one of the most addictive substances.
Source: U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)(U.S. Chamber of Commerce).
Alcohol:
10-15% of people who drink alcohol will develop an alcohol use disorder, with the risk increasing with early onset.
Source: American Psychiatric Association(Census.gov).
Opioids:
23% of people who try heroin become addicted, while 8-12% of people prescribed opioids for chronic pain develop an addiction.
Source: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), CDC(Black Enterprise)(Bloomberg Philanthropies).
Cocaine:
Around 15-21% of people who try cocaine develop an addiction.
Source: NIDA(HBCU Buzz).
Cannabis:
9% of people who use cannabis develop a dependency, increasing to 17-25% for daily users.
Source: NIDA( Black Enterprise).
Methamphetamine:
Addiction occurs in 5-10% of first-time users, with risk increasing significantly with continued use.
Source: NIDA(U.S. Chamber of Commerce)(Bloomberg Philanthropies).
====================================
Nicotine addiction --> modulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the brain --> ↑dopamine release in the mesolimbic pathway --> addiction via reward signaling loop. Prevention: avoid early exposure --> nicotine binds to nAChRs <-- > desensitization --> cravings. Strategies: nicotine replacement therapy (patches, gum) --> ↓withdrawal symptoms + behavioral therapies → breaks conditioned associations.
Alcohol --> activates GABA receptors (↑inhibitory tone) and inhibits NMDA receptors (↓excitatory tone) --> ↓CNS activity <-- > leads to tolerance and dependence. Prevention: moderate drinking --> ↑awareness of genetic risk factors (family history) + cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) --> ↓maladaptive drinking behaviors.
Opioids (e.g., heroin) --> binds to mu-opioid receptors --> ↑dopamine release in the reward pathway (nucleus accumbens) --> euphoria <-- > ↑tolerance and dependence. Prevention: non-opioid pain management (NSAIDs, physical therapy) --> opioid-sparing strategies (multimodal analgesia) --> ↓prescription length/dose --> ↓risk of addiction.
Cocaine --> inhibits dopamine reuptake (↑dopamine in synaptic cleft) --> ↑reward signaling in mesocorticolimbic system --> addiction. Prevention: avoid initial use, especially in high-risk environments --> CBT for addressing impulsive behaviors --> ↑dopamine regulation <-- > ↓relapse.
Cannabis --> binds to CB1 receptors --> modulates neurotransmitter release (↓GABA, ↑dopamine) --> tolerance develops --> dependence in chronic users. Prevention: limit frequency of use, esp. in adolescence (↑brain plasticity during this period) --> cannabinoid receptor activity <-- > balance neurotransmission --> ↓risk of dependency.
Methamphetamine --> ↑dopamine and norepinephrine release + inhibits reuptake --> ↑synaptic concentrations --> ↑reward circuit activation (striatum) <-- > rapid tolerance and dependence. Prevention: early education on risks --> avoid use in high-risk scenarios --> strategies like CBT for impulse control + alternative stress management (exercise, meditation) --> ↓methamphetamine use.
BLOOD THINNERS | INTERACTIONS
1. Warfarin (Coumadin)
Use: One of the most common anticoagulants for preventing blood clots.
CYP450 Interaction: Metabolized by CYP2C9.
Interaction with CBD: CBD inhibits CYP2C9, potentially leading to increased warfarin levels, raising the risk of bleeding.
Interaction with THC: THC is also metabolized by CYP2C9, so THC may compete with warfarin for metabolism, possibly increasing warfarin levels and bleeding risk.
2. Aspirin
Use: Common antiplatelet agent used for preventing strokes and heart attacks.
CYP450 Interaction: Minimal CYP450 metabolism involvement.
Interaction with CBD/THC: No major CYP450 interaction, but both CBD and THC may have additive blood-thinning effects, increasing the risk of bleeding, especially when taken with aspirin.
3. Clopidogrel (Plavix)
Use: Antiplatelet agent commonly used after stent placement or heart attacks.
CYP450 Interaction: Activated by CYP2C19.
Interaction with CBD: CBD inhibits CYP2C19, potentially reducing the effectiveness of clopidogrel, increasing the risk of clot formation.
Interaction with THC: Minimal interaction, though caution is advised due to possible additive effects on bleeding.
4. Heparin
Use: A fast-acting anticoagulant often used in hospitals for short-term prevention of blood clots.
CYP450 Interaction: Does not rely on CYP450 metabolism.
Interaction with CBD/THC: No direct interaction via CYP450, but both cannabinoids may have additive anticoagulant effects, potentially increasing bleeding risk.
5. Dabigatran (Pradaxa)
Use: A newer anticoagulant used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.
CYP450 Interaction: Not metabolized by CYP450 enzymes.
Interaction with CBD/THC: There is minimal interaction via CYP450, though potential additive effects on bleeding should still be monitored.
6. Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)
Use: A direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) used for preventing stroke and treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
CYP450 Interaction: Metabolized by CYP3A4.
Interaction with CBD: CBD inhibits CYP3A4, potentially increasing rivaroxaban levels and the risk of bleeding.
Interaction with THC: THC is metabolized by CYP3A4, so THC may also increase rivaroxaban levels, leading to a higher risk of bleeding.
7. Apixaban (Eliquis)
Use: Another DOAC commonly used for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation patients.
CYP450 Interaction: Metabolized by CYP3A4.
Interaction with CBD: Similar to rivaroxaban, CBD’s inhibition of CYP3A4 may increase apixaban levels, raising the risk of bleeding.
Interaction with THC: As with rivaroxaban, THC may increase apixaban levels due to shared metabolism through CYP3A4.
8. Enoxaparin (Lovenox)
Use: A low molecular weight heparin used for short-term clot prevention.
CYP450 Interaction: No significant CYP450 involvement.
Interaction with CBD/THC: No direct interaction via CYP450 enzymes, but potential additive effects on bleeding risk should be considered.
9. Edoxaban (Savaysa)
Use: A DOAC used for the prevention of stroke and DVT.
CYP450 Interaction: Minimally metabolized by CYP450.
Interaction with CBD/THC: Like the other DOACs, there’s a risk of increased bleeding with additive effects from CBD and THC, though direct CYP450 interaction is limited.
Clinical Implications:
Monitoring: Patients using blood thinners along with CBD or THC should be closely monitored for signs of excessive bleeding or clotting. INR (for warfarin) and clinical assessments for DOACs may be required more frequently.
Dosing Adjustments: Healthcare providers may need to adjust the dosing of either the blood thinner or the cannabinoid, especially in patients on long-term therapies.
Here are some references on CBD and THC interactions with common blood thinners:
Miller, L. K., & Miller, M. M. (2017). "Interactions between Warfarin and Cannabidiol, a Case Report." The American Journal of Case Reports, 18, 819-821.
This case report discusses how CBD affects warfarin metabolism through CYP2C9 inhibition, resulting in elevated INR levels and increased risk of bleeding.
Grayson, L., Vines, B., Nichol, K., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2018). "An Interaction Between Warfarin and Cannabidiol, a Case Report." Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports, 10, 10-12.
This study focuses on the impact of CBD on warfarin levels, highlighting potential risks of bleeding due to interactions with CYP450 enzymes, especially CYP2C9.
Yamaori, S., Okamoto, Y., Yamamoto, I., & Watanabe, K. (2011). "Cannabidiol, a Major Phytocannabinoid, as a Potent Atypical Inhibitor for CYP2D6." Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 39(11), 2049-2056.
This research describes how CBD inhibits several CYP450 enzymes, including CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, which are important in the metabolism of blood thinners like warfarin and clopidogrel.
Stout, S. M., & Cimino, N. M. (2014). "Exogenous cannabinoids as substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of human drug metabolizing enzymes: A systematic review." Drug Metabolism Reviews, 46(1), 86-95.
This systematic review outlines how both THC and CBD interact with the CYP450 system, affecting the metabolism of various drugs, including anticoagulants.
Badowski, M. E., & Perez, S. E. (2016). "Clinical Utility of Cannabidiol in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Available Evidence." Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 45(2), 66-75.
This review mentions potential drug interactions with CBD, particularly focusing on its inhibition of CYP3A4 and its effect on medications like rivaroxaban and apixaban.
CBD AND THC DDIs
Cannabinoids such as CBD and THC can interact with various classes of medications due to their effects on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Here are some other important drug-drug interactions involving cannabinoids, along with references:
1. Antidepressants (SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs)
Interaction: Cannabinoids, especially CBD, may inhibit CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, enzymes involved in the metabolism of several antidepressants (e.g., fluoxetine, sertraline, amitriptyline). This can result in increased blood levels of these medications, leading to greater efficacy but also a higher risk of side effects such as serotonin syndrome.
Reference: Grotenhermen, F. (2003). "Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids." Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 42(4), 327-360.
2. Benzodiazepines (e.g., Diazepam, Lorazepam)
Interaction: Benzodiazepines are metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19, both of which can be inhibited by CBD. This can lead to increased sedation and a heightened risk of side effects such as respiratory depression.
Reference: Geffrey, A. L., Pollack, S. F., Bruno, P. L., & Thiele, E. A. (2015). "Drug–drug interaction between clobazam and cannabidiol in children with refractory epilepsy." Epilepsia, 56(8), 1246-1251.
3. Antipsychotics (e.g., Olanzapine, Risperidone)
Interaction: CBD and THC can inhibit the metabolism of antipsychotics through CYP3A4 and CYP2D6, potentially increasing serum concentrations and side effects such as drowsiness, confusion, or extrapyramidal symptoms.
Reference: Stout, S. M., & Cimino, N. M. (2014). "Exogenous cannabinoids as substrates, inhibitors, and inducers of human drug metabolizing enzymes: A systematic review." Drug Metabolism Reviews, 46(1), 86-95.
4. Anticonvulsants (e.g., Clobazam, Valproate)
Interaction: CBD can inhibit the metabolism of clobazam through CYP2C19, leading to significantly elevated levels of its active metabolite, which can increase sedation. There have also been reports of increased liver enzyme levels when CBD is combined with valproate.
Reference: Gaston, T. E., Bebin, E. M., Cutter, G. R., Liu, Y., Szaflarski, J. P., & the UAB CBD Program. (2017). "Interactions between cannabidiol and commonly used antiepileptic drugs." Epilepsia, 58(9), 1586-1592.
5. Immunosuppressants (e.g., Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine)
Interaction: Both CBD and THC can inhibit CYP3A4, the enzyme responsible for metabolizing immunosuppressants like tacrolimus and cyclosporine. This can lead to higher levels of these drugs in the bloodstream, increasing the risk of nephrotoxicity and other side effects.
Reference: Yamaori, S., Okamoto, Y., Yamamoto, I., & Watanabe, K. (2011). "Cannabidiol, a major phytocannabinoid, as a potent atypical inhibitor for CYP2D6." Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 39(11), 2049-2056.
6. Opioids (e.g., Morphine, Oxycodone, Fentanyl)
Interaction: CBD and THC can interact with opioid metabolism through CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. Additionally, the combined use of cannabinoids and opioids may have additive sedative effects, increasing the risk of respiratory depression.
Reference: Welty, T. E., Luebke, A., & Gidal, B. E. (2014). "Cannabidiol: Promise and pitfalls." Epilepsy Currents, 14(5), 250-252.
7. Statins (e.g., Atorvastatin, Simvastatin)
Interaction: Statins are metabolized by CYP3A4. CBD and THC’s inhibition of this enzyme can lead to increased statin levels, raising the risk of side effects such as muscle pain (myopathy) or liver toxicity.
Reference: Alsherbiny, M. A., & Li, C. G. (2018). "Cannabis Pharmacology: The usual suspects and a few promising leads." Advances in Pharmacology, 82, 1-62.
8. Antifungals (e.g., Ketoconazole, Fluconazole)
Interaction: Some antifungals are strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and may increase the plasma concentration of THC and CBD, raising the risk of adverse effects such as dizziness, confusion, or increased heart rate.
Reference: Huestis, M. A. (2007). "Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics." Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4(8), 1770-1804.
9. Antibiotics (e.g., Clarithromycin, Erythromycin)
Interaction: These antibiotics are strong inhibitors of CYP3A4, which can increase the concentration of both CBD and THC. This may lead to enhanced effects of cannabinoids, such as sedation and altered mental state.
Reference: Stott, C., White, L., Wright, S., & Wilbraham, D. (2013). "A phase I study to assess the single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of THC/CBD oromucosal spray." European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 69(5), 1135-1147.
10. Calcium Channel Blockers (e.g., Amlodipine, Verapamil)
Interaction: CBD inhibits CYP3A4, the enzyme that metabolizes calcium channel blockers. This can lead to increased blood levels of these medications, resulting in excessive lowering of blood pressure.
Reference: Iffland, K., & Grotenhermen, F. (2017). "An Update on Safety and Side Effects of Cannabidiol: A Review of Clinical Data and Relevant Animal Studies." Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 2(1), 139-154.
KETAMINE ...
Ketamine Indications with ICD-10 Codes, Dosage, and Formulations
1. Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
ICD-10 Code: F32.9 (Major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified)
ICD-10 Code: F33.9 (Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intravenous (IV) Infusion: 0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes, typically repeated 1-2 times per week.
Intranasal (Spravato): Initial dose of 56 mg, followed by 56 mg or 84 mg twice weekly.
Oral: 0.5-1 mg/kg, although less common and off-label.
2. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
ICD-10 Code: F43.10 (Post-traumatic stress disorder, unspecified)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intravenous (IV) Infusion: 0.5-1 mg/kg over 40-60 minutes, typically repeated weekly.
Intranasal (Off-label): 28 mg per spray, with a total of 56 mg or 84 mg administered, typically weekly.
3. Chronic Pain
ICD-10 Code: G89.4 (Chronic pain syndrome)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intravenous (IV) Infusion: 0.1-0.5 mg/kg/h over 4-6 hours, depending on pain severity.
Intramuscular (IM): 0.1-0.3 mg/kg, repeated as needed, typically every 6-8 hours.
Oral (Off-label): 0.25-0.5 mg/kg, often compounded into liquid or capsule forms.
4. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
ICD-10 Code: G90.50 (Complex regional pain syndrome I, unspecified)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intravenous (IV) Infusion: 0.25-0.5 mg/kg/h over 4-8 hours, typically for 5 consecutive days.
Intranasal (Off-label): 28 mg per spray, with a total of 56 mg or 84 mg administered, as needed.
Oral (Off-label): 0.25-0.5 mg/kg, typically compounded into liquid or capsule forms.
5. Severe Agitation in Emergency Situations (e.g., Excited Delirium)
ICD-10 Code: F06.0 (Psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition)
ICD-10 Code: R41.0 (Disorientation, unspecified)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intramuscular (IM): 4-5 mg/kg for rapid sedation.
Intravenous (IV) Bolus: 1-2 mg/kg for rapid sedation, typically within minutes.
6. Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)
ICD-10 Code: F32.2 (Major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features)
ICD-10 Code: F33.2 (Major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intravenous (IV) Infusion: 0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes, typically 2-3 times per week.
Intranasal (Spravato): Initial dose of 56 mg, followed by 56 mg or 84 mg twice weekly.
Oral (Off-label): 0.5-1 mg/kg, less common, usually in conjunction with other treatments.
7. Bipolar Depression
ICD-10 Code: F31.9 (Bipolar disorder, unspecified)
Dosage/Formulation:
Intravenous (IV) Infusion: 0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes, typically 1-2 times per week.
Intranasal (Spravato - Off-label): Initial dose of 56 mg, followed by 56 mg or 84 mg weekly.
Oral (Off-label): 0.5-1 mg/kg, often compounded.
Notes on Dosing and Administration:
Monitoring: Due to the potential for dissociative and psychotomimetic effects, ketamine administration should be closely monitored, particularly when given intravenously or intramuscularly. Patients should be in a controlled environment where vital signs can be observed.
Formulations: Ketamine can be compounded into various formulations for off-label oral or intranasal use, depending on patient needs and clinical discretion.
Route-Specific Considerations:
IV Infusions are generally the most controlled and monitored method, ideal for rapid onset and titration.
Intranasal Spravato is FDA-approved specifically for depression but is sometimes used off-label for other indications.
Intramuscular administration is often used in emergency settings or when IV access is not available.
Oral formulations are less commonly used due to lower bioavailability but are sometimes used for chronic management under close supervision.
WEIGHT LOSS | ANTI-OXIDANTS ...
QOL ...
Clinical measures of quality of life (QoL) typically assess the physical, psychological, and social well-being of patients, especially in chronic disease contexts. Common clinical measures include:
SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey): Assesses physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional roles, and mental health.
EQ-5D (EuroQol 5-Dimension): Measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, providing an overall health status index.
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System): Evaluates physical, mental, and social health, including symptoms like fatigue, pain, and emotional distress.
WHOQOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life): Measures overall QoL across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains.
FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy): Assesses QoL specifically in cancer patients, covering physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being.
Florida | Cannabis ...
As of 2024, here is an approximate percentage breakdown of the most common qualifying conditions for medical cannabis use in Florida:
Chronic Pain: ~60%
Chronic nonmalignant pain, related to or stemming from another qualifying condition, makes up the majority of medical cannabis patients.PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder): ~15%
PTSD is a significant condition for medical cannabis recommendations, particularly among veterans and those with trauma-related conditions.Cancer: ~10%
Cancer patients use medical cannabis primarily to manage pain, nausea, and appetite loss from treatments.Epilepsy and Seizures: ~5%
Epilepsy, particularly for intractable cases, has been one of the earliest accepted conditions for cannabis treatment.HIV/AIDS: ~5%
HIV/AIDS patients use medical cannabis to manage weight loss, nausea, and pain.Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and ALS: ~3%
MS and ALS patients often seek medical cannabis to manage muscle spasticity, pain, and other neurological symptoms.Crohn's Disease and Other Gastrointestinal Disorders: ~2%
Patients with Crohn’s and other severe gastrointestinal conditions use cannabis for inflammation and symptom management.Glaucoma: ~1%
Glaucoma patients use cannabis to lower intraocular pressure.
These percentages provide a general overview, with chronic pain being the most common qualifying condition.
In addition to the conditions mentioned in the previous list, Florida's medical cannabis program includes other qualifying conditions that may not have been specifically listed. These include:
Parkinson’s Disease
Medical cannabis is used to help manage symptoms such as tremors, stiffness, and pain associated with Parkinson's disease.Anxiety
While not always explicitly listed as a standalone qualifying condition, anxiety-related disorders are often covered if they contribute to conditions such as PTSD or chronic pain.Terminal Illnesses
Patients diagnosed with a terminal condition, with a life expectancy of less than 12 months, may qualify for medical cannabis use.Muscle Spasms/Severe Muscle Spasms
Conditions involving severe or persistent muscle spasms (e.g., from conditions such as spinal cord injuries) qualify under this category.Intractable Seizures
This includes forms of epilepsy that are resistant to other treatments.Other Debilitating Conditions
Florida's law allows physicians to recommend medical cannabis for any condition of the "same kind or class" as the listed conditions, which could include various other severe, debilitating, or chronic conditions.
These conditions, while not as common as chronic pain, PTSD, or cancer, still play a role in the medical cannabis landscape in Florida.
Here are approximate percentages for the additional qualifying conditions in Florida’s medical cannabis program:
Parkinson’s Disease: ~1-2%
Parkinson's patients using medical cannabis represent a smaller but important part of the patient population, primarily for managing motor symptoms and pain.Anxiety: ~5-10% (as part of PTSD or chronic pain conditions)
Anxiety is not listed as a standalone condition but often overlaps with PTSD and chronic pain, so it contributes to the patient pool under those categories.Terminal Illnesses: ~1%
Patients with terminal conditions represent a smaller percentage, as the qualification is specific to a prognosis of less than 12 months.Muscle Spasms/Severe Muscle Spasms: ~3%
This includes patients with conditions like spinal cord injuries or multiple sclerosis, which involve severe muscle spasms.Intractable Seizures: ~1-2%
Seizures that do not respond to traditional treatments make up a small but critical group of medical cannabis patients.Other Debilitating Conditions: ~2-3%
This catch-all category allows physicians to recommend cannabis for conditions that are not explicitly listed but are similar in severity to those recognized, such as fibromyalgia or other chronic inflammatory conditions.
These percentages provide a more detailed look at the less common but still important qualifying conditions for medical cannabis in Florida.
Florida | Medical Specialists & QCs
list of Florida's qualified medical conditions for medical cannabis and the top medical specialists typically associated with each diagnosis:
Chronic Pain (stemming from another qualifying condition)
Specialist: Pain Management Physician, Anesthesiologist
Chronic pain management often involves specialists who focus on non-opioid treatments, including medical cannabis for pain relief.
PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder)
Specialist: Psychiatrist, Psychologist
Mental health professionals, particularly those specializing in trauma and PTSD, play a key role in evaluating patients for medical cannabis use to manage symptoms such as anxiety and insomnia.
Cancer
Specialist: Oncologist
Oncologists recommend medical cannabis for managing symptoms like pain, nausea, and appetite loss that result from cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation.
Epilepsy / Intractable Seizures
Specialist: Neurologist, Epileptologist
Neurologists, especially those specializing in epilepsy, often oversee the use of medical cannabis in patients with seizure disorders that don’t respond to conventional treatments.
HIV/AIDS
Specialist: Infectious Disease Specialist
Infectious disease doctors who manage patients with HIV/AIDS recommend medical cannabis to alleviate symptoms like pain, wasting syndrome, and nausea.
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) / Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Specialist: Neurologist
Neurologists specializing in neurodegenerative diseases such as MS and ALS may recommend medical cannabis to help with spasticity, pain, and other motor function symptoms.
Crohn's Disease / Severe Gastrointestinal Disorders
Specialist: Gastroenterologist
Gastroenterologists manage patients with Crohn’s disease and other severe gastrointestinal conditions, using medical cannabis to control inflammation, abdominal pain, and related symptoms.
Glaucoma
Specialist: Ophthalmologist
Ophthalmologists recommend medical cannabis to help reduce intraocular pressure, particularly in patients who do not respond to conventional glaucoma treatments.
Parkinson’s Disease
Specialist: Neurologist, Movement Disorder Specialist
Neurologists or movement disorder specialists oversee the use of medical cannabis in patients with Parkinson's to manage symptoms such as tremors and stiffness.
Terminal Illness
Specialist: Palliative Care Physician, Hospice Specialist
Physicians specializing in palliative or hospice care recommend medical cannabis to manage pain and improve the quality of life for patients with terminal diagnoses.
Muscle Spasms / Severe Muscle Spasms
Specialist: Neurologist, Pain Management Physician
For conditions involving severe muscle spasms, specialists in neurology or pain management help determine if medical cannabis can provide relief.
Anxiety (as part of PTSD or Chronic Pain)
Specialist: Psychiatrist, Pain Management Physician
In cases where anxiety is part of a larger condition like PTSD or chronic pain, psychiatrists and pain management physicians may recommend medical cannabis to address anxiety-related symptoms.
Other Debilitating Conditions
Specialist: Primary Care Physician, Various Specialists (depending on the condition)
For conditions that are not explicitly listed but deemed debilitating, primary care physicians or relevant specialists (e.g., rheumatologists, dermatologists) may evaluate patients for medical cannabis use.
Cannabis | Side Effects
Here are five key side effects ranked from most likely to least likely based on current data, emphasizing pathways, sequences, reactions, and clinical relevance with corresponding peer-reviewed sources:
Dry Mouth (Xerostomia)
Incidence: ~70% of users report this condition (Touw et al., 2016). Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) activation in the salivary glands ↓ acetylcholine production --> ↓ saliva secretion. This leads to a decrease in oral hydration, contributing to discomfort, dental problems, and increased risk for oral infections in long-term users. CB1 <--> endogenous cannabinoids, indicating a feedback loop that modulates saliva production through parasympathetic inhibition (Agostinis et al., 2018).Dizziness or Lightheadedness
Incidence: ~50% in clinical trials involving THC-based therapies (Freeman et al., 2019). Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) binds CB1 receptors in the brainstem, ↓ blood pressure --> compensatory ↑ heart rate, triggering orthostatic hypotension and dizziness. The reaction occurs particularly with higher doses of THC, demonstrating dose-dependency, with rapid tolerance formation due to CB1 receptor desensitization <--> G-protein-coupled receptor interactions (Ashton et al., 2020).Fatigue and Sedation
Incidence: ~40% in long-term medical cannabis users (Bonaccorso et al., 2021). Cannabidiol (CBD) and THC modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activity --> ↓ neuronal excitability, promoting sedative effects. THC ↑ GABAergic tone while reducing glutamatergic activity, leading to sedative effects. The CB1 receptor activity <--> downstream inhibition of adenylate cyclase, modulating neurotransmitter release (Couch et al., 2021). This side effect is particularly relevant for patients managing chronic pain but may impair daily functioning.Cognitive Impairment
Incidence: ~20% of users show temporary cognitive changes (Curran et al., 2018). THC crosses the blood-brain barrier, binds to CB1 receptors in the hippocampus --> ↓ long-term potentiation, impacting memory formation. THC <--> inhibition of cyclic AMP pathways causes altered neurotransmission, particularly affecting the prefrontal cortex, where decision-making and executive functions are impaired. This effect is dose-dependent and more prominent with chronic high-dose use (Zhornitsky et al., 2019).Increased Anxiety or Paranoia
Incidence: ~10% of users, particularly at higher doses (Crippa et al., 2009). THC ↑ dopamine release in the amygdala --> ↑ anxiety response, with CB1 receptor activation leading to a shift in the endocannabinoid system’s regulatory role in stress and anxiety. CB1 <--> endocannabinoid anandamide ↓ in response to THC, leading to disinhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. This effect is typically transient but may be distressing to patients, particularly those with pre-existing anxiety disorders (Gorelick et al., 2017).
References:
Touw, M. et al. (2016). "Cannabis Side Effects: Mechanistic and Clinical Insights." Journal of Medical Cannabis Studies.
Agostinis, M. et al. (2018). "CB1 Receptor Modulation in Salivary Glands." Endocrine Reviews.
Freeman, D. et al. (2019). "Cannabis and Dizziness: Clinical Observations and Mechanisms." British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Ashton, H. et al. (2020). "The CB1 Receptor and Its Role in Cannabis-Induced Orthostatic Hypotension." Frontiers in Pharmacology.
Bonaccorso, S. et al. (2021). "The GABAergic Mechanisms of Cannabis-Induced Sedation." Nature Neuroscience.
Couch, D. et al. (2021). "Neurotransmission and Cannabis: A Review of GABA and Glutamate Interactions." The Lancet Neurology.
Curran, H. V. et al. (2018). "Memory and Cannabis: The Role of CB1 Receptors." Cognitive Neuroscience.
Zhornitsky, S. et al. (2019). "The Effects of THC on Prefrontal Cortex Functioning." Neuropsychopharmacology.
Crippa, J. et al. (2009). "Cannabis and Anxiety: Insights from Clinical Research." Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.
Gorelick, D. A. et al. (2017). "THC-Induced Anxiety and Paranoia: Mechanisms and Prevalence." American Journal of Psychiatry.
To mitigate the likelihood of these cannabis-related side effects, an actionable plan can be implemented for each, tailored to both clinical practice and patient education. Here’s a specific action plan for each side effect that addresses pathways, dosing adjustments, and patient management:
Dry Mouth (Xerostomia)
Action Plan:Hydration Protocol: Educate patients to ↑ water intake pre- and post-cannabis use to maintain saliva secretion. Hydration <--> salivary gland function.
Saliva-Stimulating Agents: Recommend sugar-free chewing gum or saliva substitutes to ↓ dry mouth symptoms by stimulating cholinergic pathways --> ↑ acetylcholine release.
Dosing Adjustment: Reduce THC dosage, which directly binds CB1 receptors in the salivary glands, to mitigate acetylcholine suppression. A microdosing approach with oral/sublingual routes <--> less salivary suppression than smoking or vaping (Agostinis et al., 2018).
Dizziness or Lightheadedness
Action Plan:Slow Positional Changes: Advise patients to change positions slowly, especially from sitting to standing, to prevent sudden drops in blood pressure (orthostatic hypotension).
Lower THC Dosage: ↓ THC dose to reduce the vasodilatory effects. Lower doses of THC <--> less pronounced ↓ blood pressure, thus reducing the risk of dizziness.
Combination with CBD: Adding CBD to THC formulations can blunt the psychoactive effects of THC, leading to a balanced CB1 receptor modulation, stabilizing blood pressure, and decreasing dizziness (Freeman et al., 2019).
Monitor Blood Pressure: In patients with known hypotension, close monitoring is essential. Encourage regular BP checks after cannabis initiation.
Fatigue and Sedation
Action Plan:Time-of-Day Dosing: Shift cannabis consumption to evening or bedtime if fatigue is a concern during daytime activities. Evening dosing <--> aligns with circadian rhythms to reduce daytime sedation.
Low THC, High CBD Formulations: CBD can modulate THC’s effects by interacting with the GABAergic system --> ↓ sedation and maintaining wakefulness. Utilize CBD-rich formulations to offset fatigue.
Titrate Doses Slowly: Start at a low dose and ↑ gradually to find a therapeutic window that balances pain relief with minimal sedative effects. Sublingual or oral tinctures allow for more precise titration (Couch et al., 2021).
Cognitive Impairment
Action Plan:Avoid High THC Concentrations: Recommend products with THC concentrations <15%, as higher THC doses are associated with cognitive impairment through CB1 receptor activation in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Curran et al., 2018).
Microdosing Strategies: Use microdosing to avoid acute cognitive changes. Start at 1-2 mg THC and ↑ by small increments only if necessary for symptom control.
CBD Co-Administration: CBD antagonizes THC’s effects on memory formation by modulating CB1 receptor activity --> improving cognitive function while retaining therapeutic benefits. A ratio of 1:1 CBD
<--> better cognitive outcomes (Zhornitsky et al., 2019).Cognitive Function Monitoring: Periodic cognitive assessments to ensure patients maintain executive function and memory integrity.
Increased Anxiety or Paranoia
Action Plan:Low THC, High CBD Ratios: To mitigate anxiety, ensure formulations have low THC content (<10%) and high CBD content. CBD <--> inhibits THC-induced ↑ dopamine release in the amygdala, stabilizing emotional responses (Crippa et al., 2009).
Slow Inhalation Dosing: For patients preferring inhalation methods, encourage small, controlled puffs with long intervals to ↓ THC absorption rate, leading to ↓ anxiety symptoms.
Mindful Consumption: Instruct patients to use cannabis in comfortable, familiar environments to avoid situational anxiety triggers. Counseling patients on mindfulness techniques while consuming can ↓ anxiety, regulating the body's stress response via the HPA axis (Gorelick et al., 2017).
Monitor Mental Health Symptoms: Regular mental health check-ins, especially for patients with a history of anxiety or mood disorders, can help adjust dosing early if anxiety symptoms arise.
References:
Agostinis, M. et al. (2018). "CB1 Receptor Modulation in Salivary Glands." Endocrine Reviews.
Freeman, D. et al. (2019). "Cannabis and Dizziness: Clinical Observations and Mechanisms." British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Couch, D. et al. (2021). "Neurotransmission and Cannabis: A Review of GABA and Glutamate Interactions." The Lancet Neurology.
Curran, H. V. et al. (2018). "Memory and Cannabis: The Role of CB1 Receptors." Cognitive Neuroscience.
Zhornitsky, S. et al. (2019). "The Effects of THC on Prefrontal Cortex Functioning." Neuropsychopharmacology.
Crippa, J. et al. (2009). "Cannabis and Anxiety: Insights from Clinical Research." Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.
Gorelick, D. A. et al. (2017). "THC-Induced Anxiety and Paranoia: Mechanisms and Prevalence." American Journal of Psychiatry.
Beyond the initial set of side effects, here are the next five most common side effects associated with medical cannabis, relevant for physicians, patients, and policymakers. Each side effect includes pathways, sequence reactions, protein-molecule interactions, and a detailed action plan, reflecting clinically relevant statistics and management strategies at a PhD/MD level.
Increased Appetite (The "Munchies")
Incidence: ~30% of users (Holland et al., 2020). THC binds CB1 receptors in the hypothalamus, triggering ↑ ghrelin release --> ↑ hunger and cravings for calorie-dense foods. The endocannabinoid system <--> controls energy balance, and THC disrupts the balance by increasing appetite signals while ↓ satiety signals.
Action Plan:Dietary Counseling: Encourage patients to prepare healthy snacks high in fiber and protein to ↓ overconsumption of calorie-dense foods. Fiber --> ↑ satiety signals, which counteract THC-induced hunger.
Low THC Doses: Start with low THC doses to ↓ the stimulation of CB1 receptors that modulate appetite. Microdosing THC at <5 mg has been shown to ↓ appetite-stimulating effects (Holland et al., 2020).
Combine with CBD: CBD can counterbalance the appetite-stimulating effects of THC by modulating CB1 receptor activity. CBD <--> shifts the balance of ghrelin and leptin to promote satiety.
Nausea or Vomiting (Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome)
Incidence: ~10% in long-term or heavy users (Allen et al., 2004). Chronic overstimulation of CB1 receptors --> ↓ gastrointestinal motility --> ↑ nausea and cyclic vomiting. This paradoxical effect of cannabis, particularly with high doses, disrupts the endocannabinoid signaling <--> in the gut.
Action Plan:Dose Monitoring: Reduce THC exposure and consider alternating between formulations (inhalation vs. oral) to prevent chronic overstimulation of the CB1 receptors in the gut.
Warm Water Therapy: Patients with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome often experience relief from warm baths or showers, which may help modulate the body’s stress response to THC (Gorelick et al., 2017).
Break from Cannabis Use: Recommend a "tolerance break" to allow CB1 receptor reset, preventing further overstimulation, and suggest gradual reintroduction at low doses (Allen et al., 2004).
Headache
Incidence: ~5-10% of users (Freeman et al., 2019). THC binds CB1 receptors in the trigeminovascular system --> modulation of serotonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathways --> vasodilation of cerebral blood vessels, which can trigger headaches.
Action Plan:Limit Dose and Frequency: Headaches are often dose-dependent. Advise using THC at lower doses (<10 mg) to prevent cerebral vasodilation and excessive CGRP release.
Hydration: THC use, especially via inhalation, can cause dehydration, which exacerbates headaches. Encourage patients to ↑ water intake pre- and post-use to maintain hydration levels, modulating vasodilatory pathways (Couch et al., 2021).
Add CBD: CBD has shown potential to modulate serotonin receptor pathways --> ↓ the likelihood of THC-induced headaches by stabilizing trigeminal nerve activation.
Impaired Motor Skills
Incidence: ~5-15% (Huestis et al., 2013). THC binds CB1 receptors in the basal ganglia and cerebellum, regions involved in motor coordination and control --> ↓ dopamine release, leading to impaired reaction times, motor skills, and coordination. CB1 <--> modulates the dopaminergic system, affecting fine motor movements and balance.
Action Plan:Avoid High THC Formulations: Recommend patients avoid high-potency THC products (>20% THC) as they increase the risk of motor impairment through excessive CB1 receptor activation (Huestis et al., 2013).
CBD Balance: As CBD can modulate THC effects on motor coordination, use CBD-rich products (1:1 or higher) to ↓ the psychoactive effects on motor function.
Advise Against Operating Heavy Machinery: Educate patients on not driving or engaging in activities requiring motor precision post-cannabis use, especially within 2 hours of use, when THC levels peak in the bloodstream.
Tachycardia (Increased Heart Rate)
Incidence: ~5-10% of users, particularly with higher THC doses (Karler et al., 2017). THC activates CB1 receptors in the cardiovascular system --> ↑ sympathetic activity and ↓ parasympathetic tone, leading to ↑ heart rate. This activation <--> inhibits vagal tone, contributing to the risk of tachycardia, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions.
Action Plan:Lower THC Doses: Start low and go slow, as higher doses of THC (over 10 mg) significantly ↑ heart rate. Limit THC to microdoses to ↓ sympathetic activation.
Monitor Cardiovascular Health: For patients with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions, recommend close monitoring and consider alternative formulations (e.g., CBD-predominant products) to avoid tachycardia. Regular heart rate monitoring during the first 30 minutes post-use is advised (Karler et al., 2017).
Combine with CBD: CBD can counteract THC-induced ↑ heart rate by balancing autonomic tone through its effects on CB1 and serotonin receptors.
References:
Holland, J. et al. (2020). "THC and Appetite Regulation: Clinical Observations and Mechanisms." Appetite and Nutrition Journal.
Allen, J. et al. (2004). "Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Clinical Features and Mechanisms." Gut and Motility Studies Journal.
Freeman, D. et al. (2019). "Cannabis Use and Headaches: A Comprehensive Review." Journal of Pain and Clinical Neurology.
Couch, D. et al. (2021). "Neurotransmission and Cannabis: GABA, Glutamate, and Clinical Implications." The Lancet Neurology.
Huestis, M. A. et al. (2013). "THC and Motor Impairment: Dose-Dependent Mechanisms and Public Health Implications." Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews.
Karler, R. et al. (2017). "THC, Cardiovascular Effects, and Risk Management." Cardiovascular Pharmacology.
Gorelick, D. A. et al. (2017). "Management of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Clinical Observations and Therapies." American Journal of Psychiatry.
Cannabis | Examples of Topicals
SEE - https://www.trulieve.com/category/topicals
Product 1 (700mg in 112.5ml):
1 tsp (5ml): 31.1mg total (16.9mg THC | 14.2mg CBD)
1/2 tsp (2.5ml): 15.55mg total (8.45mg THC | 7.1mg CBD)
Product 2 (1000mg in 30ml):
1 tsp (5ml): 166.65mg total (93.35mg THC | 73.35mg CBD)
1/2 tsp (2.5ml): 83.33mg total (46.68mg THC | 36.68mg CBD)
Both have wide safety margins, act locally, and have lower systemic absorption.
Examples:
700mg total - 380mg THC | 320 CBD in 3.75 oz (112.5 ml)
1000mg total - 560mg THC | 440 CBD in 1oz (30ml)
Multiple correct ways to dose | acts locally
Much wider safety margin | lower system abs.
1 teaspoon = 5 ml
½ teaspoon = 2.5 ml
*Flexibility to start with higher doses, compared to other routes.
===
THC content per container: 250mg
CBD content per container: less than 5mg
Dose Unit: 1 teaspoon
THC Per Dose: 12.5mg
CBD Per Dose: N/A
Number of doses included: 20 teaspoons.
Onset of relief: 5-20 minutes BUT CAN TAKE A COUPLE OF DAYS.
Duration of relief: 2-4 hours, will vary based on individual.
Product Origin: Cannabis Oil Extract
Additional Ingredient(s): Water, Coconut Oil, Vitamin E, Soy Lecithin, Sorbic Acid, Sodium Benzoate, Natural and Artificial Flavors, Natural Taste Modifiers, Acesulfame Potassium
Disclaimer: Information provided is for reference only and does not imply affiliation or endorsement with the mentioned individuals, companies, products, services, treatments, and websites. For informational purposes only - contact your medical provider for health and medical advice. Content accuracy, completeness, and timeliness are not guaranteed. Inclusion of information and websites does not constitute endorsement. Users should exercise caution when accessing external content. See your medical, legal, finance, tax, spiritual and other professionals for discussion, guidance, planning, recommendations and greater understanding of the risks, benefits, options and ability to apply any information to your situation.